2006
DOI: 10.1109/mis.2006.97
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In The Truman Show: Generating Dynamic Scenarios in a Driving Simulator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Advantages of a simulator are that goal-oriented virtual worlds and scenarios can be presented and that driving performance can be assessed objectively and accurately in a standardised fashion (de Winter et al 2006a, Wassink et al 2006. It is impossible to incorporate these aspects into driver training on the road.…”
Section: Data Quality In Simulation-based Driver Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advantages of a simulator are that goal-oriented virtual worlds and scenarios can be presented and that driving performance can be assessed objectively and accurately in a standardised fashion (de Winter et al 2006a, Wassink et al 2006. It is impossible to incorporate these aspects into driver training on the road.…”
Section: Data Quality In Simulation-based Driver Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Janson Olstam and Espié (2007) present the play preparation problem using a theater metaphor, which is an extension of the theater metaphors 4 presented in Alloyer et al (1997), Espié and Rousseau (1998), and Wassink et al (2005and Wassink et al ( , 2006. The theater metaphor includes definitions of the terms play, manuscript, role, actor, stage, etc.…”
Section: The Play Preparation Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideas and frameworks, but no complete algorithms, for combining autonomous and controlled vehicles are provided by Alloyer et al (1997), Wassink et al (2005Wassink et al ( , 2006 and Janson Olstam and Espié (2007). Inspired by the work of Alloyer et al (1997) and Wassink et al (2005Wassink et al ( , 2006, Janson Olstam and Espié (2007) proposed an alternative design methodology for driving simulator experiments in which periods with autonomous simulated road users are combined with periods with only controlled simulated road users. The basic idea is to let the surrounding vehicles run in autonomous mode between the predetermined situations at which measurements are taken.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Behaviour of other vehicles, weather conditions, or the virtual environment can be manipulated in real time according to the training needs (Wassink et al, 2006). It is also possible to confront a trainee with novel technical devices such as adaptive cruise control, front wheel drive or rear wheel drive, or vehicles of different masses, which can make them aware that they should adapt their behaviour (Hoeschen et al, 2001).…”
Section: Control Over Training Conditions and Standardizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advantages of a simulator are that goal-oriented virtual worlds and scenarios can be presented, and that driving performance can be assessed objectively and accurately in a standardized fashion (De Winter et al, 2006b;Wassink et al, 2006). It is impossible to incorporate these aspects into driver training on the road.…”
Section: Data Quality In Simulation-based Driver Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%