“…Magill (1992) stated that personal religiosity affords a background, against which the ethical nature of behavior is interpreted. Light et al (1989) view religiosity as exercising control over beliefs and behaviors while Huffman (1988) states that a major theme in functionalist theory is that religiosity is a stronger determinant of our values than any other predictor. In addition, Weaver and Agle (2002) report that religiosity is known to have an influence both on human attitudes and behavior.…”
This article presents the results of a study that investigated the roles that religiosity and ones money ethic play in determining consumer attitudes/ beliefs in various situations regarding questionable consumer practices. One dimension of religiosity -intrinsic religiousness -was studied. Four separate dimensions of a money ethic scale were initially examined, but only one was used in the final analyses. Results indicated that both intrinsic religiousness and one's money ethic were significant determinants of most types of consumer ethical beliefs.
“…Magill (1992) stated that personal religiosity affords a background, against which the ethical nature of behavior is interpreted. Light et al (1989) view religiosity as exercising control over beliefs and behaviors while Huffman (1988) states that a major theme in functionalist theory is that religiosity is a stronger determinant of our values than any other predictor. In addition, Weaver and Agle (2002) report that religiosity is known to have an influence both on human attitudes and behavior.…”
This article presents the results of a study that investigated the roles that religiosity and ones money ethic play in determining consumer attitudes/ beliefs in various situations regarding questionable consumer practices. One dimension of religiosity -intrinsic religiousness -was studied. Four separate dimensions of a money ethic scale were initially examined, but only one was used in the final analyses. Results indicated that both intrinsic religiousness and one's money ethic were significant determinants of most types of consumer ethical beliefs.
“…Vitell et al (2005) in a survey of undergraduate students found that intrinsic religiousness was a significant determinant of consumer ethics, whereas extrinsic religiousness did not impact the ethicality of consumer practices. When religion becomes intrinsic to one's being, it influences one's values which then motivate attitudes and behavior (Huffman, 1988;Magill, 1992). Linking religion with values, Allport and Ross (1967, p. 434) went as far as to say that, ''extrinsically motivated person uses his religion whereas the intrinsically motivated person lives his religion.''…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
“…Therefore, religiosity can be viewed as exercising control over beliefs and behaviors (Light et al, 1989). A major theme in functionalist theory is that religiosity is a stronger determinant of our values than almost any other predictor (Huffman, 1988). Thus, it is logical and appropriate to examine the relationship between religiosity and ethics and to hypothesize that there are meaningful and significant relationships between personal religiosity and ethical judgments.…”
This article presents the results of an exploratory study that investigated the role that religiosity plays in determining consumer attitudes/beliefs in various situations regarding questionable consumer practices. Two dimensions of religiosity --intrinsic and extrinsic religiousness --were studied. Results indicated that an intrinsic religiousness was a significant determinant of consumer ethical beliefs, but extrinsic religiousness was not related to those beliefs.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.