In their own words: An Australian community sample’s priority concerns regarding mental health in the context of COVID-19

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in significant and unprecedented mental health impacts in Australia. However, there is a paucity of research directly asking Australian community members about their mental health experiences, and what they perceive to be the most important mental health issues in the context of the pandemic. This study utilises qualitative data from Alone Together, a longitudinal mixed-methods study investigating the effects of COVID-19 on mental health in an Australian community sample (N = 2,056). A total of 1,037 participants, ranging in sex (69.9% female), age (M = 40–49 years), state/territory of residence, and socioeconomic status, shared responses to two open-ended questions in the first follow up survey regarding their mental health experiences and priorities during COVID-19. Responses were analysed using thematic analysis. Participants described COVID-19 as primarily impacting their mental health through the disruption it posed to their social world and financial stability. A key concern for participants who reported having poor mental health was the existence of multiple competing barriers to accessing high quality mental health care. According to participant responses, the pandemic placed additional pressures on an already over-burdened mental health service system, leaving many without timely, appropriate support. Absent or stigmatising rhetoric around mental health, at both a political and community level, also prevented participants from seeking help. Insights gained from the present research provide opportunities for policymakers and health practitioners to draw on the expertise of Australians’ lived experience and address priority issues through targeted policy planning. This could ultimately support a more responsive, integrated, and effective mental health system, during and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.

Impact of COVID-19 on lifestyle and mental wellbeing in a drought-affected rural Australian population: A mixed method approach

“…Furthermore, significant financial stress has been associated with increased interpersonal stressors, greater psychological distress and lower levels of psychological well-being (30). It is suggested that economic measures such as JobKeeper and JobSeeker (31) may have prevented the worst of the impact as government policy directed towards financial protection of Australians during COVID has been shown to improve mental health outcomes (32).…”

The Social Determinants of Loneliness During COVID-19: Personal, Community, and Societal Predictors and Implications for Treatment

“…To be eligible to participate, participants were required 18+, residing in Australia and have sufficient English proficiency to understand the survey and consent procedures. Further description of recruitment and consent procedures are available in Bower et al (2021Bower et al ( , 2022.…”

Public Health Management of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Australia: The Role of the Morrison Government

“…State governments are responsible for determining what public health measures are appropriate and implementing them—including managing the border quarantine arrangements and the testing, tracing, and isolation regime—and managing the hospital response. States are also responsible for developing strategies to mitigate potential mental health and other effects of restrictions, and to address equity issues in the management of health outcomes and care [ 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 ]. The regulation of workplace health and safety was principally covered by state public health orders.…”