1983
DOI: 10.1002/cyto.990030609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In‐use evaluation of the omnicon automated tumor colony counter

Abstract: The reproducibility and accuracy of the Omnicon (Bausch and Lomb Inc., Rochester, NY) automated tumor colony counter for counting tumor colonies growing in double layer soft agar is evaluated and the reproducibility is compared with manual tumor colony counting. Replicate within day runto-run colony counts of the Omnicon show a median correlation coefficient (r) of >0.985, and day-to-day median r of >0.980. In contrast, for manual colony counting, the best intra-observer reproducibility achieved is a r of 0.94… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dynamic growth of colonies cultured in vitro was detected and followed by counting two dishes twice a week over a period of 3-6 weeks [21]. All colony counting was performed using the Omnicon Fas TI automated colony counter (Milton Roy Inc., Analytical Product Division, Rochester, NY), as previously decribed [22].…”
Section: Determination Of the Anchorage-independent Clonogenic Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dynamic growth of colonies cultured in vitro was detected and followed by counting two dishes twice a week over a period of 3-6 weeks [21]. All colony counting was performed using the Omnicon Fas TI automated colony counter (Milton Roy Inc., Analytical Product Division, Rochester, NY), as previously decribed [22].…”
Section: Determination Of the Anchorage-independent Clonogenic Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Automation of colony counting has been of increasing interest for many decades (1)(2)(3), and these methods have been shown to be more consistent than manual counting (1,4). Herman et al (5) demonstrated that automated colony counts had significantly less variation when reanalyzing plates than those manually determined by individual or multiple observers. Similarly, Lumley et al (6) attributed the significant disparity in colony forming unit granulocyte-macrophage assay results across laboratories to differences in colony counting.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the detection of the growth potential of tumor cells in soft agar a modified two-layer soft agar culture method as originally described by Hamburger and Salmon [25] was used [26]. Growth potential was quantified using an Omnicon Fas I1 automated colony counter (Milton Roy, Rochester, NY, USA) [27].…”
Section: Human Tumor Colony-forming Assay (Htcs)mentioning
confidence: 99%