2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2016.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-vitro activity of solithromycin against anaerobic bacteria from the normal intestinal microbiota

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In an infant with E. coli and B. fragilis mixed infectious meningitis (Ganeshalingham et al 2014 ), B. fragilis was confirmed resistant to ceftriaxone. In an in-vitro susceptibility test (Weintraub et al 2016 ), Prevotella isolates were susceptible to metronidazole but resistant to ceftriaxone. It is well-known that metronidazole had a very good activity against most strict anaerobes, including Prevotella (Bancescu et al 2015 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an infant with E. coli and B. fragilis mixed infectious meningitis (Ganeshalingham et al 2014 ), B. fragilis was confirmed resistant to ceftriaxone. In an in-vitro susceptibility test (Weintraub et al 2016 ), Prevotella isolates were susceptible to metronidazole but resistant to ceftriaxone. It is well-known that metronidazole had a very good activity against most strict anaerobes, including Prevotella (Bancescu et al 2015 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Azithromycin was the most active antibiotic tested against the gram-negative anaerobes (Williams et al, 1992). Compared with a MIC 90 against azithromycin ranging from 2.0 to 256 mg/L to different species of LAB (Weintraub et al, 2016), the 3 strains all showed moderate resistance, with MIC of 20 mg/L. The MIC of the investigated strains against cephalexin was 640 mg/L, showing much higher resistance than either the DSM 20021T strain or Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG (Coppola et al, 2005).…”
Section: Antibiotic Susceptibilitymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The in vitro activity of AZM on the genus Prevotella has been proven for a long time with modifications of microbiota [142] and low MICs [143][144][145][146][147][148][149][150][151], providing bactericidal activity [152] and including β-lactamaseproducing strains of Prevotella spp [149,153]. But it was reported that the MICs varied mostly according to strains [154] with ranges of MIC between ≤0.02 and >256, whether by dilution in agar medium [155][156][157] or by the E test method [158,159] or by disc diffusion method [160], and to differences in the susceptibility profiles in separate countries [161]. Resistome analysis of the gut microbiome of preschool children from 30 Nigerian communities randomized to either biannual AZM or placebo showed an increase in macrolide resistance gene expression in communities treated with AZM (P=0.004).…”
Section: Immunological Argumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%