2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2009.09.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro activity of tigecycline against 2423 clinical isolates and comparison of the available interpretation breakpoints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We found that the tigecycline susceptibility rates for ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae measured using FDA criteria were about 10% higher than those measured using EUCAST breakpoints. Similar differences in susceptibility rates obtained using the two criteria were noted in a study conducted in Greece, namely, that the susceptibility rates for K. pneumoniae were 99% according to FDA criteria and 91% as measured using EUCAST criteria (16). That study also reported a major difference in susceptibility of isolates of Enterobacter spp.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We found that the tigecycline susceptibility rates for ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae measured using FDA criteria were about 10% higher than those measured using EUCAST breakpoints. Similar differences in susceptibility rates obtained using the two criteria were noted in a study conducted in Greece, namely, that the susceptibility rates for K. pneumoniae were 99% according to FDA criteria and 91% as measured using EUCAST criteria (16). That study also reported a major difference in susceptibility of isolates of Enterobacter spp.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…That study also reported a major difference in susceptibility of isolates of Enterobacter spp. (16). In a study conducted during the period from 2005 to 2009 in the United States, the rates of tigecycline susceptibility as measured by FDA and EUCAST criteria differed by 0.6% for ESBL-producing E. coli (100% versus 99.4%; n ϭ 334; P ϭ 0.499) and by 7.3% for K. pneumoniae (97.9% versus 90.6%; n ϭ 426; P Ͻ 0.001) (18).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although tigecycline has not been approved for hospital-acquired pneumonia, some studies report excellent tissue penetration in murine epithelial lung fluid of tigecycline 24 and its efficacy in Acinetobacter sp. 3,22 Moreover, decreased activity of tigecycline against A baumannii, as was found in this study and was reported in a previous study, 17 should be considered for patients with persistent A baumannii infection because we noted A baumannii, secondary to P aeruginosa, as one of the important superinfection pathogens during tigecycline treatment. To avoid the selection of tigecycline-resistant A baumannii, some authorities suggest a higher mutant prevention concentration in the treatment of carbapenem-resistant A baumannii.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…22 The impact of tigecycline on gut colonization was not assessed in this study. Our results revealed that tigecycline did not increase infections with clinical Candida species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation