Forty-six subjects (44 HIV antibody-positive) with some degree of immune deficiency (at least TH/TS
ratio below 1 ) were randomly distributed into 4 treatment groups. Each group was assigned to 1 of 4 products to be
used exclusively for a 1-year period: 1 concentrate was of intermediate purity and not heat-treated, and 3 were
heat-treated in order to inactivate HIV, 2 of them being of higher purity. At 4-6-month intervals, check-ups,
including as markers clinical examination, platelet, lymphocyte and T cell subset counts, IgG levels and delayed
hypersensitivity test, were carried out. At entry as well as at the end of the study, groups were not statistically
distinguishable. No intra- nor inter-group differences were demonstrable for any of the markers. In contrast, using a
scoring system for each marker and the results of check-up at entry as reference, significant differences between
groups appeared on subsequent check-ups. Patients receiving intermediate-purity factor VIII, whether heat-treated
or not, were mostly steady, while groups receiving heat-treated concentrates of a higher purity significantly worsened.
This surprising outcome was no related to differences in anti-HIV titers or specificities. From this study, the potential
long-term predictive value of this scoring system could not be established.