1980
DOI: 10.1159/000466963
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro and in vivo Characterization of Factor VIII Preparations

Abstract: An in vitro and in vivo comparison of nine commercial and noncommercial factor VIII preparations was made. These consisted of one lyophilized cryoprecipitate, four intermediate (IPC) and four high purity concentrates (HPC). Protein, fibrinogen, factor VIII complex, IgG, IgM and anti-A and B alloagglutinins levels were measured. These three qualities of product were defined by two ratios: units of F VIII : C per mg of protein and per mg of fibrinogen. They were, respectively, <0.5 and <1 in cryoprecipitate, 0.5… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
24
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
4
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the 4 products randomly assigned to 13 patients in this study was not heat-treated and used before October 1985, when both HIV antibody screening of donors and viral inactivation of coagulation factor concentrates became mandatory in France. From a previous study, the presence of infective HIV particles in the French factor VIII concentrate used here was demon strated, since a yearly prevalence of HIV seroconversion was calculated at 37% in a similarly treated population [10], Index parameters in this group remained similar to the other 3 groups at each of the 2 or 3 check-ups, and no significant difference was observed between the initial and the final examinations. When results were analysed with the score system, the outcome of patients in the group infused with the non-heat-treated product ap peared rather stable ( fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One of the 4 products randomly assigned to 13 patients in this study was not heat-treated and used before October 1985, when both HIV antibody screening of donors and viral inactivation of coagulation factor concentrates became mandatory in France. From a previous study, the presence of infective HIV particles in the French factor VIII concentrate used here was demon strated, since a yearly prevalence of HIV seroconversion was calculated at 37% in a similarly treated population [10], Index parameters in this group remained similar to the other 3 groups at each of the 2 or 3 check-ups, and no significant difference was observed between the initial and the final examinations. When results were analysed with the score system, the outcome of patients in the group infused with the non-heat-treated product ap peared rather stable ( fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Two products (factor VIII concentrate CNTS and Hemofil T) had a relatively low specific activity (0.6 and 0.9 IU/mg of factor VIII protein, respectively) and contained similar contaminating proteins in various proportions. Methods to study proteins in factor VIII concentrates were previously described [10]. Fibrinogen represented 50 and 36% of total proteins; fibronectin 15and 40%;IgG lOand 6%; IgM 2 and 1.3%, and albumin 15 and 1%, respectively.…”
Section: Replacement Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The titration curves in the IRMA did not parallel those of normal plasma, thus indicating the presence of complexes. (27). Ordinate: log plasma concentration of IX:C and IX:Ag.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although they generally contain considerable amounts of vWf: Ag and sometimes a high level of ristocetin cofac tor [ 11 ], most intermediate and high-purity FVIII concen trates are unsuitable in vWD. Their failure to correct bleeding time in vWD patients [12] reflected by their inability to induce platelet adhesion to subendothelium [13] is generally thought to be related to their lack of high molecular weight forms of vWf.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%