2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2011.04.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro and in vivo approaches for the measurement of oral bioavailability of lead (Pb) in contaminated soils: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
79
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
4
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At present, several in vivo animal modelsincluding mouse and swine have beenused to assess Pbrelative bioavailability (RBA, relative to water soluble lead acetate) [11][12][13][14].However, in vivo assays are costly and time consuming, therefore not suitable to measure site-specific Pb-RBA on a large scale. As a result, various in vitro assays to determine Pb bioaccessibility have been developed, whichmeasures the soluble Pb fraction from soil in simulatedhuman gastrointestinalfluids [10][11][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, several in vivo animal modelsincluding mouse and swine have beenused to assess Pbrelative bioavailability (RBA, relative to water soluble lead acetate) [11][12][13][14].However, in vivo assays are costly and time consuming, therefore not suitable to measure site-specific Pb-RBA on a large scale. As a result, various in vitro assays to determine Pb bioaccessibility have been developed, whichmeasures the soluble Pb fraction from soil in simulatedhuman gastrointestinalfluids [10][11][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a surrogate for bioavailability, a class of in vitro test known as bioaccessibility testing has been developed and validated specifically for this purpose page 4 of 35 and is available to be used as a conservative estimate of bioavailability. The development of bioaccessibility testing methods for Pb in soil has recently been comprehensively reviewed (Zia et al, 2011). In general the bioaccessibility tests fall into two categories: (i) those which try to closely mimic the physiological conditions in the stomach and upper intestine DIN, 2000;Oomen et al, 2002;Wragg et al, 2011) and (ii) methods which use a simplified extraction media ( (Drexler and Brattin, 2007;Zia et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there is still some discussion over the relative merits of the different methodologies (Zia et al, 2011), the method adopted by this study is the Unified BARGE method (UBM) which has undergone interlaboratory trials and been validated against a swine model for Pb (Caboche, 2009;Denys et al, 2012). The fraction of a PHE assessed in an in vitro bioaccessibility assay is that which is released from the soil into solution in the gastro-intestinal (GI) tract in a form that can potentially be absorbed into the blood stream (Paustenbach, 2000;Wragg and Cave, 2003;Intawongse and Dean, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Understanding the spatial patterns of soil lead can elucidate sources in the environment and facilitate a broader appreciation for the processes that shape our urban places [44]. In addition to total lead, testing for bioavailable or bioaccessible lead can determine whether soil amendments are successful at reducing potential exposure [45,46]. Minca et al [46] provide a decision table regarding the use of a bioaccessible lead test for urban soils with an emphasis on food production.…”
Section: Soil Management Amendments and Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%