2008
DOI: 10.1007/s12223-008-0046-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Vitro antibacterial effects of antilipopolysaccharide DNA aptamer-C1qrs complexes

Abstract: DNA aptamers were developed against lipopolysaccharide (LPS) from E. coli O111:B4 and shown to bind both LPS and E. coli by a colorimetric enzyme-based microplate assay. The polyclonal aptamers were coupled to human C1qrs protein either directly using a bifunctional linker or indirectly using biotinylated aptamers and a streptavidin-C1qrs complex. Both systems significantly reduced colony counts when applied to E. coli O111:B4 and K12 strains across a series of 10x dilutions of the bacteria in the presence of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
38
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
38
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike the bacterial killing experiments of Bruno et al (2008c) in which precipitous drops in colony counts were noted as a function of increasing aptamer-C1qrs conjugate to bacteria ratios, lysis of cancer cells is less dramatic. The decreased efficacy of aptamer-mediated and antibodymediated cancer cell killing via serum complement proteins is probably due to a combination of MUC1 surface antigen shedding (Chan et al 1999;Moreno et al 2007;Storr et al 2008;Rubinstein et al 2009) during the experiment and membrane-bound complement regulatory molecules such as CD46, CD55, and CD59 on normal and cancer cells (Halulinen and Meri 1998;Farkas et al 2002;Donin et al 2003;Yan et al 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Unlike the bacterial killing experiments of Bruno et al (2008c) in which precipitous drops in colony counts were noted as a function of increasing aptamer-C1qrs conjugate to bacteria ratios, lysis of cancer cells is less dramatic. The decreased efficacy of aptamer-mediated and antibodymediated cancer cell killing via serum complement proteins is probably due to a combination of MUC1 surface antigen shedding (Chan et al 1999;Moreno et al 2007;Storr et al 2008;Rubinstein et al 2009) during the experiment and membrane-bound complement regulatory molecules such as CD46, CD55, and CD59 on normal and cancer cells (Halulinen and Meri 1998;Farkas et al 2002;Donin et al 2003;Yan et al 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…It may seem superficially obvious that aptamers could take on many of the physiological or immune system functions of antibodies such as opsonization of encapsulated bacteria (Bruno et al 2008b) or complement-mediated target cell lysis (Bruno et al 2008c), but one should consider the complex conformational changes that occur in some of these processes. For example, C1q must bind to two adjacent IgG antibodies or one IgM on a target cell surface and then undergo conformational changes with C1r and C1s bound to it in order to induce the esterase activity which sets off the remainder of the complement cascade and culminates in cell lysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A DNA aptamer against lipopolysaccharide of E. coli O111:B4 was selected (Bruno et al, 2008b) and applied as a basis for a conjugate with human C1qrs protein which activates the complement system responsible for non-specific resistance to bacteria. The resultant conjugate demonstrated an antibacterial activity in the presence of complement proteins, and could be considered as a prospective antibacterial drug.…”
Section: Antibacterial Aptamersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bruno et al have recently evolved two DNA aptamers; one against E. coli O111 lipopolysaccharides [21] that were employed in a displacement voltammetric assay [22] and the other against outer membrane proteins (OMPs) [23]. In the latter work several aptamers were obtained and tested for competitive displacement FRET assays.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%