2012
DOI: 10.1016/s2221-1691(12)60236-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro antimicrobial effects of grape seed extract on peri-implantitis microflora in craniofacial implants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some studies that made use of P reported several MIC values against S. aureus such as 242 mg/mL (Nuamsetti, Dechayuenyong, & Tantipaibulvut, 2012), 2 mg/mL (Al-Zoreky, 2009) 15.6 mg/mL (Naziri, Rajaian, & Firouzi, 2012), and 50 mg/mL (Gullon, Pintado, Pérez-Alvarez, & Viuda-Martos, 2016). There are also some studies in which MIC values were reported as 0.625 mg/mL (Shrestha, Theerathavaj, Thaweboon, & Thaweboon, 2012) The differences in MIC values are thought to be caused by the characteristics of the materials used in extraction, extraction procedures and solvents, or differences in the resistance levels of the strains used (McCarrell et al, 2008). As a result, it has been found that all the extracts used in this study had significant antimicrobial activity on…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some studies that made use of P reported several MIC values against S. aureus such as 242 mg/mL (Nuamsetti, Dechayuenyong, & Tantipaibulvut, 2012), 2 mg/mL (Al-Zoreky, 2009) 15.6 mg/mL (Naziri, Rajaian, & Firouzi, 2012), and 50 mg/mL (Gullon, Pintado, Pérez-Alvarez, & Viuda-Martos, 2016). There are also some studies in which MIC values were reported as 0.625 mg/mL (Shrestha, Theerathavaj, Thaweboon, & Thaweboon, 2012) The differences in MIC values are thought to be caused by the characteristics of the materials used in extraction, extraction procedures and solvents, or differences in the resistance levels of the strains used (McCarrell et al, 2008). As a result, it has been found that all the extracts used in this study had significant antimicrobial activity on…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Some studies that made use of P reported several MIC values against S. aureus such as 242 mg/mL (Nuamsetti, Dechayuenyong, & Tantipaibulvut, ), 2 mg/mL (Al‐Zoreky, ) 15.6 mg/mL (Naziri, Rajaian, & Firouzi, ), and 50 mg/mL (Gullon, Pintado, Pérez‐Álvarez, & Viuda‐Martos, ). There are also some studies in which MIC values were reported as 0.625 mg/mL (Shrestha, Theerathavaj, Thaweboon, & Thaweboon, ) and 1.156‐ ≤ 150 μL (Al‐Nimer, Rasheed, & Saadaldin, ) for GS extracts against S. aureus . Similarly, various MIC values such as 0.2–0.5 mg/mL (Hannan, Saleem, Chaudhary, & Barkaat, ) and 1,125 μg/mL (Alam, Yasmin, Nessa, & Ahsan, ) were reported for NS extract.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Binith Shrestha and Srithavaj et al, the structure-activity correlation assays showed that the hydroxyl group of the phenolic compound was found to be effective against E.coli and the benzene ring was effective against S. aureus. 8 According to Al-Habeb A and Al-Saleh E et al the antibacterial effect of grape seed extract against MRSA is due to disruption of bacterial cell wall membrane in scanning and transmission electron microscopy which could be accounted to the presence of potent polyphenolics in grape seed extract. 9 Though the study produced moderate zones of inhibition which was comparable to that of the stated references; it can further be performed with better methodologies to improve the results and to increase the effectiveness of grape seed extract against virulent strains…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Treating peri-implantitis involves antioxidant supplemention [4]. Sheresta et al stated that grape seed extract has positive effect on treating peri-implantitis [23]. For bone healing and bone formation, it was reported that caffeic acid phenethyl ester which can be found in propolis have significantly improved bone healing in rat models [24].…”
Section: Oral-maxillofacial Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%