2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2018.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro biocompatibility of new bioactive lithia-silica glass-ceramics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An advantageous aspect of bioactive glass is its bioactivity and biocompatibility. Previous studies adopted the direct contact cell viability method to evaluate the biocompatibility of bioactive glass and showed a high cell survival rate [43,44]. As a very safe material and based on the merits stated above, a potential new application of bioactive glass is for dental caries prevention and remineralization of early caries lesions [45].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An advantageous aspect of bioactive glass is its bioactivity and biocompatibility. Previous studies adopted the direct contact cell viability method to evaluate the biocompatibility of bioactive glass and showed a high cell survival rate [43,44]. As a very safe material and based on the merits stated above, a potential new application of bioactive glass is for dental caries prevention and remineralization of early caries lesions [45].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies have also demonstrated that surfaces with high surface free energy foster microbial adherence in vitro and in vivo [35][36][37][38]. In addition, bacteria with high cell surface free energy appear to adhere preferentially to surfaces with high surface free energy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bacterial adhesion to a substrate and the initial biofilm composition is also related to surface hydrophobicity, and communication between existing microorganisms [28,37,38]. Although the literature shows that bacteria adhere better to hydrophobic surfaces, biofilm formation depends not only on the surface topography but also on the bacteria species involved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The orientation, shape, and distribution of crystal sizes, homogeneity, and the proportion of the glassy matrix and crystalline phase control the exural strength and fracture toughness of the glass-ceramic materials [2,28]. The surface morphology showed for all groups that the crystals have lath-shaped [6,29] and an interlocked microstructure that is an important characteristic for the mechanical performance of the material [3,10,11,23,30] because it allows during the de ection of the crack that the path that it would have to travel increases and consequently consumes more energy [3,10,11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is considered that the greater the aesthetics of ceramic materials, the lower their fracture resistance, since they present a greater glass phase and a lower crystalline phase, as is the case of glass-ceramics that are considered a special group of materials and have their microstructure composed of one or more crystalline phases embedded in glass matrix [3], with crystallinity ranging from 30-70% and crystals with needle morphology with dimensions from 3 µm to 6 µm [3,9]. This con guration results in a microstructure with lithium disilicate crystals interlocked lath-shaped that promote an increase in the exural resistance of these materials and result in the limitation of the propagation of the crack, because the conformation of the crystals make that, during the de ection of the crack, the path that the crack would have to go through increases [3,[9][10][11] and, consequently, consumes more energy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%