1967
DOI: 10.1016/s0368-1319(67)80056-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro boundary layer studies of blood flow in branched tubes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1967
1967
1983
1983

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At branches or bifurcations, boundary layer separation may occur on one wall, resulting in the formation of a standing vortex. This has been predicted theoretically (50) and has been observed in vitro (51,52) and in vivo (53). In this region, shear rates are low and stagnation occurs behind the vortex; here concentration polarization would be greatest.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…At branches or bifurcations, boundary layer separation may occur on one wall, resulting in the formation of a standing vortex. This has been predicted theoretically (50) and has been observed in vitro (51,52) and in vivo (53). In this region, shear rates are low and stagnation occurs behind the vortex; here concentration polarization would be greatest.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…In flow experiments the values used have not always been realistic. Davis [1963], Krovetz [1965] and Gutstein and Schneck [1967] all used an area ratio of 2. In the models illustrated by Attinger [1964], while the diameters of the branches and stems varied, the ratio was again close to a value of 2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The possibility of flow separation at or rather immediately beyond the lateral angles of forks has been considered by several workers [Stehbens, 1960;Gutstein and Schneck, 1967]. Caro [1966] asserted that the area ratio would determine whether or not flow separation could occur at arterial forks and indicated that 1-2 has been regarded as the critical value above which flow separation is likely [Lighthill, 1972].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recent studies have shown that the area ratio of a typical arterial bifurcation is on the order of unity (4), and, indeed, that the area ratio of the aortic-iliac bifurcation is generally less than unity, even for nonatherosclerotic subjects (34). The results of earlier model studies (35)(36)(37)(38)(39), however, are all based on flow through branching geometries for which the outlet area was approximately equal to twice the inlet area for each branching configuration. The conclusions that are drawn in these studies with respect to conditions leading to transition (36,37), flow separation (38,39), and platelet deposition (35) are not necessarily applicable to flow in the arterial system.…”
Section: Gessner Flow Separation Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%