In vitro caries inhibition at the enamel margins of glass ionomer restoratives developed for the ART approach

Smales, Roger J.; Gao, Wei

doi:10.1016/s0300-5712(99)00071-8

Cited by 59 publications

(53 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…One study showed that GIS was four times as effective in preventing the development of caries in pits and fissures even with sealant loss compared to composite resin sealants over a 1-to 3-year period 33) . Other in vitro studies have shown that GIS materials improve enamel strength in fissures 33,34) . Glass ionomer sealants should be called 'fluoride depot cements' because they slowly release fluoride 35) .…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 91%

“…Similarly, saliva fluoride levels were not significantly higher than those at baseline in either group. In-vitro studies have confirmed that glass-ionomer cements can act as rechargeable reservoirs, distributing a continuous low level of fluoride due to uptake from fluoridated solutions, dentifrices and mouthwashes 10,34) . Factors including the components of saliva, the acquired pellicle, pH, and ion concentration that might have decreased fluoride diffusion from the sealant were not analyzed 37) .…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 97%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A 48-month randomized controlled trial of caries prevention effect of a one-time application of glass ionomer sealant versus resin sealant

Haznedaroğlu

Güner

Duman

et al. 2016

Dental Materials Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study was to compare the caries prevention effectiveness, retention rates and the level of fluoride of saliva of a glassionomer sealant (GIS) with that of a resin-based sealant (RS). Eighty GIS and 80RS were placed on the first permanent molars in 40 children aged 7-10 years. Children were re-examined at 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months after the procedure. Saliva samples were collected before the sealant was applied and again at each appointment, and fluoride levels were measured. After 48 months, occlusal caries were seen in 4 and 12 teeth in GIS and RS groups respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in the fluoride levels of saliva between baseline and up to 12th month in GIS group. GISs presented effective prevention of caries development, even though the failure rate is higher when compared to the RSs. An increased salivary fluoride level due to GISs might be an additive effect on the prevention of dental caries.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 91%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 97%

A 48-month randomized controlled trial of caries prevention effect of a one-time application of glass ionomer sealant versus resin sealant

Haznedaroğlu

Güner

Duman

et al. 2016

Dental Materials Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…5 The fluoride released by these restorative materials will be incorporated by the enamel and dentine, increasing its resistance to demineralisation from bacterial attack. [6][7][8][9] There is no formation of an initial lesion or recurrence of caries in cavity walls restored with GIC. 10 The carious process ceases and remineralisation of the affected dentine occurs.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Microhardness of dentine underlying ART restorations in primary molars: an in vivo pilot study

et al. 2005

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…This is because of its chemical adherence to dental tissue, coefficient of thermal expansion similar to that of a tooth (9), biocompatibility properties (10), and caries protective effect through the release of fluoride (10,11), which has antibacterial properties (3,12) and potentiates remineralization that may prevent the development of secondary caries (13). Furthermore, GIC restorations may act as a rechargeable fluoride release system (14,15 ried success rate for retention from 63% to 100% (16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Survival of Occlusal ART Restorations in Primary Molars Placed in School Environment and Hospital Dental Setup-One Year Follow-up Study

Roshan

Basha²

2011

Med Oral

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: The objectives of this clinical study were to: evaluate the survival of occlusal atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) restorations, on a longitudinal basis, in the primary molars of children; and compare the success rate of ART restorations placed in school environment and in hospital dental setup. Study design: One dentist placed 120 ART restorations in 60 five-to seven year-olds who had bilateral matched pairs of carious primary molars. A split-mouth design was used to place restorations in school and in hospital dental setup, which were assigned randomly to contralateral sides. Restorations were evaluated after 6 and 12 months using the ART criteria. Results: The survival rate of ART restorations placed in school environment was 82.2% at the 6-month assessment and 77.77% at the 12-month assessment. The success rates of ART restorations placed in hospital dental setup in the 2 assessments were 87.7% and 81.48%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the ART restorations placed in school environment and hospital dental setup in both assessments (P>O.05). The main cause of failure was the loss of restoration. Conclusions: The one year success rate of occlusal ART restorations in primary molars was moderately successful. The ART technique's done in hospital dental setup was not proven to be better than restorations placed in school environment.

show abstract

In vitro caries inhibition at the enamel margins of glass ionomer restoratives developed for the ART approach

Cited by 59 publications

References 8 publications

A 48-month randomized controlled trial of caries prevention effect of a one-time application of glass ionomer sealant versus resin sealant

A 48-month randomized controlled trial of caries prevention effect of a one-time application of glass ionomer sealant versus resin sealant

Microhardness of dentine underlying ART restorations in primary molars: an in vivo pilot study

Survival of Occlusal ART Restorations in Primary Molars Placed in School Environment and Hospital Dental Setup-One Year Follow-up Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About