2003
DOI: 10.1007/bf03263162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Vitro Clonal Propagation Through Bud Culture of Hemidesmus indicus (L) R Br: An Important Medicinal Herb

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, in other medicinal plants like Eclipta alba (Baskaran and Jayabalan, 2005), Vanilla planifolia (Abebe et al, 2009), Pogostemon cablin (Swamy et al, 2010) and Enicostema axillare (Loganathan and Bai, 2014) BA with Kn induced optimum shoots from in vitro nodes. Moreover, the potency of in vitro nodes to regenerate shoots was less as compared to in vivo nodal explants of the same plant (Patnaik and Debata, 1996;Sreekumar et al, 2000;Misra et al, 2003;Saha et al, 2003), it is also in contradiction to the earlier report which states that the potency of in vivo and in vitro nodes is the same (Sreekumar et al, 2000). But this study is in continuation of previous work in which from single node around 11 shoots were formed within eight weeks, each shoot had an average 7 nodes .…”
Section: Shoot Regenerationmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, in other medicinal plants like Eclipta alba (Baskaran and Jayabalan, 2005), Vanilla planifolia (Abebe et al, 2009), Pogostemon cablin (Swamy et al, 2010) and Enicostema axillare (Loganathan and Bai, 2014) BA with Kn induced optimum shoots from in vitro nodes. Moreover, the potency of in vitro nodes to regenerate shoots was less as compared to in vivo nodal explants of the same plant (Patnaik and Debata, 1996;Sreekumar et al, 2000;Misra et al, 2003;Saha et al, 2003), it is also in contradiction to the earlier report which states that the potency of in vivo and in vitro nodes is the same (Sreekumar et al, 2000). But this study is in continuation of previous work in which from single node around 11 shoots were formed within eight weeks, each shoot had an average 7 nodes .…”
Section: Shoot Regenerationmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Nevertheless, regeneration through leaf explant is known to induce soma clonal variants and hence nodes are best suitable explants when the aim is to produce true-to-type plants (Pathak and Joshi, 2018). There are reports on H. indicus regeneration using nodal explants (Patnaik and Debata, 1996;Sreekumar et al, 2000;Misra et al, 2003;Saha et al, 2003;Shekhawat and Manokari, 2016;. However, the plant is a slow growing and sparingly branched in wild (Sreekumar et al, 2000) and hence use of nodal explant for plant regeneration may increase the threat on its population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An unusual phenolic compound, 2-hydroxy-4-methoxybenzaldehyde (MBALD) that accumulates in the root organs of H. indicus, is mainly responsible for this sweet flavor/fragrance (Sreekumar et al, 1998;Sircar et al, 2007a). Several reports are now available on the in vitro propagation of this plant of economic importance (Sreekumar et al, 2000;Misra et al, 2003;Saha et al, 2003). However, nothing is known on the enzymatic route of this fragrant hydroxybenzoate formation or even its distribution in the root tissue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Adventitious shoots, which arise directly from the nonmeristematic tissues of the explant, can provide a reliable method to get true-to-type plants, where as the adventitious shoots arise through caulogenesis has the advantage of creating useful somaclonal variations and in gene transfer technology. Micropropagation through adventtious shoots has been reported as an appropriate method of multiplication in many Asclepiadaceous plants (Prasad et al, 2004;Saha et al, 2003;Faisal and Anis, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%