In vitro culture of Chrysanthemum plantlets using light-emitting diodes

Kurilčik, A.; Miklušytė-Čanova, Renata; Dapkūnienė, Stasė; Žilinskaitė, S.; Kurilčik, G.; Тамулайтис, Г.; Duchovskis, Pavelas; Žukauskas, A.

doi:10.2478/s11535-008-0006-9

Cited by 97 publications

(92 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The same effect was observed by Kurilčik et al [10] and Lin et al [28] during in vitro development of Chrysanthemum plantlets and Dendrobium officinale protocorms, respectively. In Phalaenopsis, LEDs had no effect on the number of roots, while in A. andreanum the highest number of roots was obtained in FLs and Chlorophyll 100 blue LEDs.…”

Section: Chlorophyllsupporting

confidence: 80%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Light‐Emitting Diodes: Progress in Plant Micropropagation

Bello-Bello¹,

Pérez-Sato²,

Cruz‐Cruz³

et al. 2017

Chlorophyll

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In commercial micropropagation laboratories, the light source is one of the most important factors controlling plant morphogenesis and metabolism of plant cells and tissue and organ cultures. Lamp manufacturers have begun to rate lamps specifically for plant needs. The traditional light source used for in vitro propagation is fluorescent lamps (FLs). However, power consumption in FL use is expensive and produces a wide range of wavelengths (350-750 nm) unnecessary for plant development. Light-emitting diodes (LEDs) have recently emerged as an alternative for commercial micropropagation. The flexibility of matching LED wavelengths to plant photoreceptors may provide more optimal production, influencing plant morphology and chlorophyll content. Although previous reports have confirmed physiological effects of LED light quality on morphogenesis and growth of several plantlets in vitro, these study results showed that LED light is more suitable for plant morphogenesis and growth than FLs. However, the responses vary according to plant species. This chapter describes the applications and benefits of LED lamps on chlorophyll in plant micropropagation. Two study cases are exposed, Anthurium (Anthurium andreanum) and moth orchids (Phalaenopsisis sp.), both species with economic importance as ornamental plants, where LEDs have a positive effect on in vitro development and chlorophyll content.

show abstract

Section: Chlorophyllsupporting

confidence: 80%

“…[7], Solanum tuberosum [8], Chrysanthemum [9,10], Vitis riparia × V. vinifera [11], Brassica napus [12], Populus euroamericana [13], and Saccharum spp. [14], among others.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Light‐Emitting Diodes: Progress in Plant Micropropagation

Bello-Bello¹,

Pérez-Sato²,

Cruz‐Cruz³

et al. 2017

Chlorophyll

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In addition, B LEDs light were important for the formation of chlorophyll, chloroplast development and stomatal opening (Senger et al, 1982). Light from B plus R LEDs influenced anatomical features, photosynthesis, growth and development in pepper, lily, strawberry, cherry tomato, rapeseed, non-heading Chinese cabbage and chrysanthemum (Schuerger et al, 1997;Lian et al, 2002;Nhut et al, 2003;Kurilcik et al, 2008;Liu et al, 2011aLiu et al, , 2011bFan et al, 2013a;2013b;Li et al, 2013).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of different light quality on growth, photosynthetic characteristic and chloroplast ultrastructure of upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) seedlings

Tang

2017

Emir. J. Food Agric

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effects of different light emitting diodes (LEDs) on growth, photosynthetic characteristic and chloroplast ultrastructure of upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) seedlings. Seedlings of the cultivar Sumian 22 were grown under seven different lights including blue (B) plus red (R) LEDs BR (1:8, 1:3, 1:1, 3:1), B LEDs, R LEDs and fluorescent lamps (FL) with the 100 μ mol m -2 s -1 photosynthesis photon flux (PPF) and a 12 hour photoperiod for 40 days. Compared with FL, fresh mass, dry mass, root length, stem width, root activity, length of palisade tissue and stomatal frequencies were significantly greater as well as the thickest grana lamella in chloroplast in seedlings grown under BR1:8 LEDs; The chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophyll contents, photosynthetic rate, leaf thickness, spongy tissue length and stomatal areas were highest in seedlings under B LEDs; The stem length, leaf area, sucrose, soluble sugar and starch concentrations were highest as well as the greatest number and volume of starch grains in chloroplast in seedlings under R LEDs. It was suggested that BR1:8 LEDs might be used as a primary light for the cultivation of upland cotton seedlings under controlled conditions.

show abstract

“…Nesse aspecto, diferentes espectros de luz podem alterar o crescimento e desenvolvimento dos tecidos de plantas cultivadas in vitro (KURILCIK et al, 2008;BRAGA et al, 2009). TANAKA et al (1998 reportaram aumento no crescimento de plântulas da orquídea terrestre Cymbidium sob luzes LED (light-emitting diodes) nas cores azul e vermelho, assim como a luz vermelha emitida por lâmpadas fluorescentes provocaram maior comprimento de broto para híbrido de Cattleya (CYBULARZ-URBAN et al, 2007) O presente trabalho teve por objetivo avaliar a propagação in vitro e aclimatização de plântulas germinadas de Cattleya loddigesii, orquídea brasileira de grande relevância ecológica e econômica, em meio nutritivo suplementado com concentrações de carvão ativado sob a luminosidade branca e vermelha.…”

Section: Introductionunclassified