2009
DOI: 10.1208/s12249-009-9339-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Vitro Dissolution Testing with Flow-Through Method: A Technical Note

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
30
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…F20 dissolution behavior was further investigated using the USP apparatus 4 (flow-through, open-loop configuration), which is reported to closely mimic in vivo hydrodynamics and thus to better predict in vivo performance of solid oral dosage forms. [31][32][33] As shown in Figure 6, the apparatus 4 confirmed that F20 had enteric release behavior (19% of the drug released in 2 h at pH 1) and in SIF showed a slower rate than that obtained using the USP paddle method.…”
Section: Drug Releasesupporting
confidence: 55%
“…F20 dissolution behavior was further investigated using the USP apparatus 4 (flow-through, open-loop configuration), which is reported to closely mimic in vivo hydrodynamics and thus to better predict in vivo performance of solid oral dosage forms. [31][32][33] As shown in Figure 6, the apparatus 4 confirmed that F20 had enteric release behavior (19% of the drug released in 2 h at pH 1) and in SIF showed a slower rate than that obtained using the USP paddle method.…”
Section: Drug Releasesupporting
confidence: 55%
“…In particular, the slower release rates obtained with the flow‐through apparatus indicated that the medium flowing through the sample at the selected flow rate (4 ml/min) provided a relative mild shear force compared with that generated by the paddle agitation speed (10 rpm). An analogous result was observed by a comparison of the two methods in drug release studies from tablets …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…At a fixed moment of time, a sample of 5 mL was taken, then filtered using a 0.45 μm pore size filter; the magnesium content was determined with the use of an inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometer (ICP-OES) Optima 5300 DV (Perkin Elmer, USA). The equation LOD=3 sb/m (where sb was the standard deviation of 10 successive determination of blank and m was the slope of calibration curve) was used to calculate the limit of detection as being LOD=0.01 mg/L [21]. At the magnesium emission line (285 nm) were not revealed interferences with potassium, phosphorus and sodium.…”
Section: Study Of the Release Of The Magnesium Ionmentioning
confidence: 99%