2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2004.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro effects of ultrasound with different energies on the conduction properties of neural tissue

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
89
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
5
89
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In vitro [41][42][43] and in vivo studies have shown that US interacts with 44 and could be used to activate 31,45 neurons. The cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway provides a physiologic means by which US, possibly through interacting with the splenic nerve, may interfere with the pathogenesis of IRI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In vitro [41][42][43] and in vivo studies have shown that US interacts with 44 and could be used to activate 31,45 neurons. The cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway provides a physiologic means by which US, possibly through interacting with the splenic nerve, may interfere with the pathogenesis of IRI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We believe that the splenic nerve is the proximal target of ultrasound treatment, a hypothesis supported by observations that ultrasound alters frog peripheral nerve activity. 36 Transcranial ultrasound-induced neuromodulation in rodents induces limb movement, 37 thereby further suggesting a biomechanical effect of ultrasound. Although we have not shown a direct effect of ultrasound on splenic nerve activity, which would be technically difficult in the mouse, we used 6-OHDA, which selectively destroys catecholaminergic nerve terminals peripherally 15 or when injected directly in brain regions, 38,39 to denervate the spleen and interrupt the cholinergic antiinflammatory signaling pathway.…”
Section: Neural Control Of Inflammationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hypothesized mechanisms for this effect include ultrasoundinduced microstreaming caused by local pressure gradients within the bone microstructure, or the generation of an electric field caused by mechanical movement of ionic fluids within the bone. Another author observed similar effects using low-amplitude, unfocused shock waves (van der Jagt et al 2013), and the hypothesized mechanism was acoustic cavitation. However, the majority of evidence suggests that neither treatment of the intact bone by shock waves nor treatment of the bone by LIPUS is efficient in mitigating bone loss (Carvalho and Cliquet Junior 2004;Warden et al 2001a;Yang et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Ultrasound has also been used in animal models in an attempt to mitigate bone loss induced by spinal cord injury, ovariectomy and neurectomy, yet the results remain controversial (Carvalho and Cliquet Junior 2004;Cook et al 2001;Ferreri et al 2011;Gollwitzer et al 2013;van der Jagt et al 2013;Warden et al 2001a;Yang et al 2005). In particular, Ferreri et al (2011) applied LIPUS to the L4 and L5 vertebrae in ovariectomized rats for 20 min daily, 5 d a wk, for 4 wk, and observed partial mitigation of trabecular bone loss compared with the control group.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%