2022
DOI: 10.1056/nejmc2211845
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Vitro Efficacy of Antiviral Agents against Omicron Subvariant BA.4.6

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since then CoV2 has continued to evolve, there now being additional Omicron variants (BA.4, BA.5, BA.2.12.1, BA.2.75, XBB) and "Scrabble" subvariants (BQ.1 and BQ1.1) with Spike protein sequences that further desensitize the virus to in vitro neutralization by many (but not all) monoclonal therapies (109)(110)(111)(112), as well as convalescent plasma (113). Since Omicron has a higher tropism for the nasopharyngeal and oral cavities than that of pre-Omicron lineages (39)(40)(41)(42)(43), saliva antibodies may be more important inhibitors of Omicron transmission than plasma or lower airway antibodies, and saliva-the collection of which is far easier than blood-may be more suitable for rapid determination of whether someone has neutralizing capacity against future CoV2 variants that have yet to emerge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then CoV2 has continued to evolve, there now being additional Omicron variants (BA.4, BA.5, BA.2.12.1, BA.2.75, XBB) and "Scrabble" subvariants (BQ.1 and BQ1.1) with Spike protein sequences that further desensitize the virus to in vitro neutralization by many (but not all) monoclonal therapies (109)(110)(111)(112), as well as convalescent plasma (113). Since Omicron has a higher tropism for the nasopharyngeal and oral cavities than that of pre-Omicron lineages (39)(40)(41)(42)(43), saliva antibodies may be more important inhibitors of Omicron transmission than plasma or lower airway antibodies, and saliva-the collection of which is far easier than blood-may be more suitable for rapid determination of whether someone has neutralizing capacity against future CoV2 variants that have yet to emerge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When looking specifically at Omicron sublineages, remdesivir retained its activity across all major circulating sublineages, i.e., BA.1, BA.2, BA.4 and BA.5 (Veklury, 2022), as well as, most recently, BQ.1.1 and XBB (Imai et al, 2022). The same is true for molnupiravir, which has retained its antiviral efficacy against BA.1 ( Uraki et al, 2022b) and BA.2 in vitro (Takashita et al, 2022a) and in hamster models (Uraki et al, 2022a), and in vitro against BA.5 (Takashita et al, 2022b), BQ.1.1 and XBB (Imai et al, 2022).…”
Section: Antiviral Activity Of Rdrp Inhibitors Across Sars-cov-2 Vari...mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…From the data available so far, nirmatrelvir has retained antiviral activity across the most important dominant variants: Alpha, Delta (Vangeel et al, 2022), Omicron BA.1 (Joyce et al, 2022;Vangeel et al, 2022), BA.2 (Takashita et al, 2022a;Uraki et al, 2022a), BA.5 (Takashita et al, 2022b), BQ.1.1 and XBB (Imai et al, 2022).…”
Section: Protease Inhibitor-nirmatrelvir/ Ritonavirmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Los datos recientes del Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Infecciosas de Tokio, Japón, sugieren que remdesivir, molnupiravir y nirmatrelvir y los anticuerpos monoclonales bebtelovimab e imdevimab conservan su eficacia contra la BA.4.6 in vitro. Los resultados también indican que los anticuerpos monoclonales casirivimab, sotrovimab, tixagevimab y cilgavimab pueden no ser eficaces contra la BA.4.6 (18) . Sin embargo, en el caso de BQ.1.1 y las 6+ mutaciones hay evidencia preocupante de escape inmunológico, por la pérdida anticipada de eficacia de los anticuerpos monoclonales evusheld o bebtlelovimab.…”
Section: Infección Por Las Nuevas Subvariantes Sars-cov-2 Con El Uso ...unclassified