Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
PurposeTo assess the flexural strength (FS), surface roughness, and color stability of additive manufactured (AM) and subtractive manufactured (SM) denture teeth materials, as well as the effect of thermocycling on these properties.Materials and MethodsEighty strips (20/material type; 64×10×3.3 mm) and 60 discs (15/material type; 12×4 mm) were fabricated from four different denture teeth materials (Straumann, Flexcera, Ivoclar, and Candulor). The specimens were divided into two subgroups (nonthermal cycled and 5000 thermal cycled,10 per subgroup), and subjected to a 3‐point test for FS using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 5.0 mm/min. Surface roughness (Ra, µm) and color differences (ΔE00) of disc specimens were measured before and after thermocycling using a noncontact optical profilometer and a spectrophotometer, respectively. The CIEDE2000 formula was used to calculate the color differences (ΔE00) before and after thermocycling. Data were analyzed using 2‐way ANOVA followed by post hoc multiple comparison tests (α = 0.05).ResultsThere was no significant difference in flexural strength between nonthermal cycled SM materials (p = 0.15), which were significantly higher than AM materials (p < 0.001). The flexural strength values of all tested materials were significantly reduced after thermocycling (p < 0.05). The material type had a significant effect on the Ra values (p < 0.001), whereas thermocycling did not (p = 0.81). After thermocycling, all materials exhibited color changes lower than the clinical perceptible threshold (ΔE00 = 2.7).ConclusionsThermocycling decreased the FS of denture teeth materials manufactured with AM and SM, but did not affect the surface roughness. The FS values of SM groups were significantly higher than AM materials, irrespective of thermocycling. No clinically significant color changes of the denture teeth material were noted.
PurposeTo assess the flexural strength (FS), surface roughness, and color stability of additive manufactured (AM) and subtractive manufactured (SM) denture teeth materials, as well as the effect of thermocycling on these properties.Materials and MethodsEighty strips (20/material type; 64×10×3.3 mm) and 60 discs (15/material type; 12×4 mm) were fabricated from four different denture teeth materials (Straumann, Flexcera, Ivoclar, and Candulor). The specimens were divided into two subgroups (nonthermal cycled and 5000 thermal cycled,10 per subgroup), and subjected to a 3‐point test for FS using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 5.0 mm/min. Surface roughness (Ra, µm) and color differences (ΔE00) of disc specimens were measured before and after thermocycling using a noncontact optical profilometer and a spectrophotometer, respectively. The CIEDE2000 formula was used to calculate the color differences (ΔE00) before and after thermocycling. Data were analyzed using 2‐way ANOVA followed by post hoc multiple comparison tests (α = 0.05).ResultsThere was no significant difference in flexural strength between nonthermal cycled SM materials (p = 0.15), which were significantly higher than AM materials (p < 0.001). The flexural strength values of all tested materials were significantly reduced after thermocycling (p < 0.05). The material type had a significant effect on the Ra values (p < 0.001), whereas thermocycling did not (p = 0.81). After thermocycling, all materials exhibited color changes lower than the clinical perceptible threshold (ΔE00 = 2.7).ConclusionsThermocycling decreased the FS of denture teeth materials manufactured with AM and SM, but did not affect the surface roughness. The FS values of SM groups were significantly higher than AM materials, irrespective of thermocycling. No clinically significant color changes of the denture teeth material were noted.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.