2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2016.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Vitro Evaluation of Upstream and Downstream Influences on Blood Pressure of the Hybrid Treatment of Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the stiffness of the stent-graft is known to modify the aortic compliance and alters both forward transmission and backward reflection of the sphygmic wave. [6][7][8][9][10][11] This interference could potentially affect the systolic afterload to left ventricular (LV) contraction and the coronary driving pressure pattern, and altering myocardial perfusion response to physical or emotional stresses, especially in patients with co-existing coronary artery disease (CAD). [12][13][14] From the methodological point of view, the altered transmission of the pressure wave hampers the accuracy of the clinical evaluation of LV function by the ejection fraction (EF), since the uncertain pressure at the aortic valve (AV) does not permit to correctly account for the vascular resistance to systolic output.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, the stiffness of the stent-graft is known to modify the aortic compliance and alters both forward transmission and backward reflection of the sphygmic wave. [6][7][8][9][10][11] This interference could potentially affect the systolic afterload to left ventricular (LV) contraction and the coronary driving pressure pattern, and altering myocardial perfusion response to physical or emotional stresses, especially in patients with co-existing coronary artery disease (CAD). [12][13][14] From the methodological point of view, the altered transmission of the pressure wave hampers the accuracy of the clinical evaluation of LV function by the ejection fraction (EF), since the uncertain pressure at the aortic valve (AV) does not permit to correctly account for the vascular resistance to systolic output.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the underlying mechanisms still need to be cleared, the haemodynamic consequence of EVAR might contribute to the risk of cardiac events. Indeed, the stiffness of the stent‐graft is known to modify the aortic compliance and alters both forward transmission and backward reflection of the sphygmic wave 6–11 . This interference could potentially affect the systolic afterload to left ventricular (LV) contraction and the coronary driving pressure pattern, and altering myocardial perfusion response to physical or emotional stresses, especially in patients with co‐existing coronary artery disease (CAD) 12–14 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%