In vitro fatigue resistance of glass ionomer cements used in post-and-core applications

Gateau, Philippe; Sabek, Marc; Dailey, Bruno

doi:10.1067/mpr.2001.114882

Cited by 23 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…That was a shortcoming of the study. Gateau et al [26] established that silver reinforced GIC had statistically higher degree of inefficiency in comparison with amalgam and composite resin. This is identical with the findings of this work.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Fracture Resistance of Restored Maxillary Premolars

Petronijevic

Marković

Sarcev

et al. 2013

Contemporary Materials

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Extensively damaged teeth can be restored by different core build-up materials. The aim of this study was to examine the fracture resistance of restored maxillary premolars with composite resin, dental amalgam and glass ionomer cement (GIC) using compressive strength test. Also, to analyse the influence of bond strength of restorative materials on intact and carious dentin. Eighty extracted human maxillary premolars with intact and carious dentin were used in the study. The control group consisted of ten unrestored teeth with intact dentin. Artificial defect in dentin was prepared using diamond bur up to the half of the anatomic crown of the tooth. After core build-up procedure, each specimen was mounted in auto polymerizing acrylic resin blocks 2mm below cement enamel junction and they were kept in distilled water at 37 o C one day before testing. Then, they were placed in specially adapted devices at an angle of 183 o to the longitudinal axis and subjected to a controlled load of 1mm per minute. There were significant differences among control group and restored teeth with composite resin, amalgam and GIC. Results showed that the best fracture values were obtained in control group (749,4N , then intact teeth restored with composite resin (492,5N) and amalgam (341,2N). In the group with carious dentin, values were lower, for composite resin 345,5 N and for amalgam 474,5N. There were no significant differences among restored groups with intact and carious dentin (p<0.05). The fracture force corresponding to the teeth restored with GIC were significantly lower compared to the control group and the group with composite resin and amalgam. Satisfactory mechanical properties of restored premolars were obtained using composite resin and dental amalgam as a core build-up material. The carious-affected dentin led to lower bond strength of restored teeth.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Fracture Resistance of Restored Maxillary Premolars

Petronijevic

Marković

Sarcev

et al. 2013

Contemporary Materials

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…59 In some in vitro studies, silver particle additives are reported to be efficient to prevent bacterial adhesion on dental restorative surfaces. 57,58 However, silver in silver amalgam and dental casting alloys have been used for a long time in dentistry and have shown to have only some short-term and mild antibacterial effect in vitro.…”

Section: Silver Fluoridementioning

confidence: 99%

Silver compounds used in dentistry for caries management: A review

Peng

Botelho

Matinlinna

2012

Journal of Dentistry

248

173

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The literature places concerns forward regarding the intrinsic strength of Fuji IXGP for core buildup scenarios [56]. By in vitro analysis, fatigue resistance of two glass ionomer cements, viz: Shofu Hi-Dense and Fuji IXGP were compared for their mechanical properties as core materials under loading versus silver-reinforced glass ionomer (Ketac-Silver) and amalgam [56]. Fuji IXGP when used as core material showed higher number of defects than amalgam.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Next generational fuji IX-a proposed universal dental material–but not yet 'set in cement'

Loudon¹

2014

Oral Biol Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this article a summary from the literature is presented for the use of next generational conventional glass ionomer cement (Fuji IXGP) for a plethora of dental situations. Applications include not only restorative but also cementation and core buildup scenarios. Fuji IXGP fluoride release, radio-opacity and reasonable aesthetics offer-up advantages in field and Special Needs dentistry as well as in the clinic for caries susceptible individuals. The adaptability of such a material thus ranks it highly for virtually universal use in clinical practice and encapsulation frees the operator from variability in hand-mixing. Personal experience in many clinical situations with this material is recounted. Downsides in terms of its physical properties are outlined and means and ways to aid addressing these aspects are portrayed. Further, along these lines, it is noted that the so-called 'ideal' biocompatible restorative dental material is not available as yet and the field is undergoing constant re-evaluation and change. Clinicians should be flexible to incorporate novel approaches into their dentistry based on individual experience. Ultimately, sound, evidence-based randomized controlled, blinded, clinical trials determine the best direction to pursue yet oftentimes anecdotal findings may initiate and inspire such trials. Clinicians are urged to be pro-active in implementing research strategies into their daily routine with the concept in mind that the largest laboratory of all is, in the end, the clinic itself.

show abstract

In vitro fatigue resistance of glass ionomer cements used in post-and-core applications

Cited by 23 publications

References 23 publications

Fracture Resistance of Restored Maxillary Premolars

Fracture Resistance of Restored Maxillary Premolars

Silver compounds used in dentistry for caries management: A review

Next generational fuji IX-a proposed universal dental material–but not yet 'set in cement'

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About