2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.01.112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro fertilization is a successful treatment in endometriosis-associated infertility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
102
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
10
102
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results are in concordance with the 2011 registry data from the SART; both live birth rates per cycle commenced and implantation rates are comparable to tubal factor controls. Similar to our results, in 2,245 women with various stages of endometriosis or tubal factor infertility undergoing IVF, comparable pregnancy rates were recently reported among early-stage, late-stage disease and control groups [10]. In contrast to our results, the 2002 meta-analysis, after adjusting for stimulation regimen, publication date and female age, reported significantly less implantation and pregnancy rates in the endometriosis group compared to the controls; furthermore, the late-stage disease was associated with significantly lower pregnancy rates [7].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results are in concordance with the 2011 registry data from the SART; both live birth rates per cycle commenced and implantation rates are comparable to tubal factor controls. Similar to our results, in 2,245 women with various stages of endometriosis or tubal factor infertility undergoing IVF, comparable pregnancy rates were recently reported among early-stage, late-stage disease and control groups [10]. In contrast to our results, the 2002 meta-analysis, after adjusting for stimulation regimen, publication date and female age, reported significantly less implantation and pregnancy rates in the endometriosis group compared to the controls; furthermore, the late-stage disease was associated with significantly lower pregnancy rates [7].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The results of these meta-analyses, however, are in contrast to the 2011 registry data from Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART); both live birth rates per cycle commenced and implantation rates are comparable to tubal factor controls [9]. A recent study enrolling 1,074 patients with different stages of endometriosis and 1,171 patients with tubal factor controls also concluded that endometriosis per se was not associated with inferior pregnancy rates [10]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a preliminary study [36] Mathieu d'Argent et al, found a PR after one IVF-ICSI cycle of 41%. Moreover, in accordance with a previous study [35], no difference in PR was noted between women with colorectal endometriosis and those with tubal or male infertility. Subsequently, in a multicenter study including the women from Mathieu d'Argent et al's series, Ballester et al [37] showed that the cumulative PRs after one and two IVF-ICSI cycles were 29.3 and 52.9%, respectively.…”
Section: Fertility After Mar In Women With In Situ Colorectal Endometsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This first-intention MAR option would appear to be suitable as a previous study [35] demonstrated that, with the exception of women with endometrioma, infertile women with various stages of endometriosis have the same PR rates in IVF-ICSI than those with tubal factor. In a preliminary study [36] Mathieu d'Argent et al, found a PR after one IVF-ICSI cycle of 41%.…”
Section: Fertility After Mar In Women With In Situ Colorectal Endometmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Some authors suggest that IVF performance (oocytes quality, fertilization rates, embryo quality, and live birth rates) in the presence of endometriosis is impaired [18,34] while others show reserved outcomes [35,48]. Nevertheless, when good quality oocytes are fertilized, or when a large number of embryos is available, implantation rates seem to return to control values [49].…”
Section: Embryo/egg Freezingmentioning
confidence: 99%