1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0300-5712(99)00019-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro fluoride release from restorative materials in water versus artificial saliva medium (SAGF)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0
5

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
32
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The F À ion release into water, as reported here, is considerably reduced when the release takes place into saliva [18] or artificial saliva [19]. This is attributed to F À being precipitated as CaF 2 [20]. Although CaMFP is not very soluble (0.42 g/ 100 ml) it is B500 Â more soluble than CaF 2 (8.1 ppm) and might therefore not exhibit such a considerable reduction in release.…”
Section: Article In Presssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…The F À ion release into water, as reported here, is considerably reduced when the release takes place into saliva [18] or artificial saliva [19]. This is attributed to F À being precipitated as CaF 2 [20]. Although CaMFP is not very soluble (0.42 g/ 100 ml) it is B500 Â more soluble than CaF 2 (8.1 ppm) and might therefore not exhibit such a considerable reduction in release.…”
Section: Article In Presssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Fluoride release behavior is influenced by the type of medium [16][17][18] . Previous studies have compared fluoride release in distilled water and artificial saliva, and have reported that the amount of fluoride ion released in distilled water was greater than that in artificial saliva 16,17) . Another previous study reported that the pH value of the solution also influences the release of fluoride ion by restorative materials 18) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 This is responsible for the phenomenon of "burst effect," wherein high amounts of fluoride are released during the first two days. 3,5,[10][11][12] Fluoride release declines rapidly during the first week and stabilizes after three to four weeks. [12][13][14][15] Caries lesions adjacent to the restoration are likely to take from several months to several years to develop.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various media (deionized water, artificial saliva and lactic acid) have been used for measuring the amount of fluoride released. [10][11] Despite the desirable property of fluoride-release, conventional glass ionomers have several disadvantages, such as water sensitivity, poor strength and low occlusal wear resistance. The high sensitivity of these cements to water causes erosion of the glass ionomers during the early setting period, and this further increases the elution of fluoride.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%