2019
DOI: 10.1007/s42535-019-00085-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro high frequency multiplication and assessment of genetic fidelity of Corallocarpus epigaeus: an endangered medicinal plant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1e and Table 1). However, the regeneration studies carried out previously in the same plant showed the maximum percentage response of 68.33 on BA (0.5 mg/l) + IAA (2.0 mg/l) (Narayan 2016) and 88 on TDZ (1.5 mg/l) + IAA (1.5 mg/l) (Vemula et al 2020). The combination of IBA and BAP was also found to be effective in species like Bryonopsis lacinosa, where IBA and BAP induced multiple shoots from cotyledon derived callus (Caroline and Mallaiah 2011), whereas in Cicer arietinum, IBA and BAP resulted in maximum percentage of response in all explants (Sadhu et al 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1e and Table 1). However, the regeneration studies carried out previously in the same plant showed the maximum percentage response of 68.33 on BA (0.5 mg/l) + IAA (2.0 mg/l) (Narayan 2016) and 88 on TDZ (1.5 mg/l) + IAA (1.5 mg/l) (Vemula et al 2020). The combination of IBA and BAP was also found to be effective in species like Bryonopsis lacinosa, where IBA and BAP induced multiple shoots from cotyledon derived callus (Caroline and Mallaiah 2011), whereas in Cicer arietinum, IBA and BAP resulted in maximum percentage of response in all explants (Sadhu et al 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…As per the above reason, it is very essential for conservation and in vitro propagation. The in vitro propagation studies were carried out in C. epigaeus for protection of species with the help of leaf and node explants, due to lack of a suitable method for natural regeneration and over-exploitation of C. epigaeus, which severely deteriorated the species consequently recording them as endangered species (Vemula et al 2020). Due to exploitative harvesting of tubers for trade and denudation of forests, the natural population of C. epigaeus has declined to such an extent that it is now considered rare and threatened in its natural habitats (Narayan 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA based molecular markers emerged as the most suitable genetic tools to determine the genetic variation among regenerated plants 6 . Molecular markers such as randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) 7 , amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) 8 , simple sequence repeat (SSR) 9 and inter simple sequence repeats (ISSR) 10,11 are used for determining the genetic fidelity of micro propagated plants. Cost-effectiveness is a major checkpoint in micropropagation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 5 below lists 12 plants (28%) that have been reported to be endangered and 31 tuberous anthelmintic plants are not endangered. Other endangered tuberous plants are Corallocarpus epigaeus(Vemula et al 2020), , , etc. Other anthelmintic plants that have been reported to be endangered areIIek khasiana(Lalnunfela et al 2020), Picrorhiza kurroa(Mehta et al 2021), Potentilla fulgens(Kumar et al 2020), Embelia ribes(Choudhary et al 2021b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%