2003
DOI: 10.1080/0265204031000154179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro/in vivo evaluation of the efficiency of teicoplanin-loaded biodegradable microparticles formulated for implantation to infected bone defects

Abstract: Chronic osteomyelitis is still the cause of many problems in orthopaedics in terms of therapy and infection persistence. Four-to-six week systemic antibiotic therapy is required along with bone and soft tissue debridement in the therapy of chronic osteomyelitis. Prolonged-release local antibiotic therapy has been taken into consideration due to the side effects encountered in long-term high dose antibiotic use and the duration of hospitalization of the patients. Although local antibiotic therapy has been achie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, there have been no prospectively designed, randomized, controlled trials comparing the antibiotic-impregnated cement spacer options with adequate numbers of patients and long-term follow-up to guide the clinical practice. In vivo/in vitro studies demonstrated that teicoplanin-impregnated cement spacers were found to be effective in the treatment of infected joint arthroplasties [30][31][32]. Teicoplanin covers only the Grampositive microorganisms and this may be considered as a disadvantage when used in antibiotic impregnated cement spacer during the first stage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…To date, there have been no prospectively designed, randomized, controlled trials comparing the antibiotic-impregnated cement spacer options with adequate numbers of patients and long-term follow-up to guide the clinical practice. In vivo/in vitro studies demonstrated that teicoplanin-impregnated cement spacers were found to be effective in the treatment of infected joint arthroplasties [30][31][32]. Teicoplanin covers only the Grampositive microorganisms and this may be considered as a disadvantage when used in antibiotic impregnated cement spacer during the first stage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Due to the fundamental problems with PMMA, various biodegradable and bioresorbable carriers of antibiotics for the treatment and prevention of prosthetic joint infections have been studied based on poly (α-hydroxy acid) polymers such as PLGA (18)(19)(20) and PHBV (21)(22)(23). In particular, PLGA (19,20,(24)(25)(26) and PHBV (27,28) microspheres have been used to deliver a variety of antibiotics for the treatment of bone infections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The biodegradable polymers that have been used include poly(D,L-lactic acid) [10,11], polylactide-co-glycolide [4,[12][13][14], copolymers of L-lactide and D,L-lactide [15], polyanhydrides of bis-carboxyphenoxypropane and sebacic acid [16], polycaprolactone [17][18][19], and polyhydroxyalkanoate [20]. These polymers release antibiotics for several hours to 40 weeks in vitro, and are effective for several weeks in vivo [21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%