2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro/in vivo evaluation of HPMC/alginate based extended-release matrix tablets of cefpodoxime proxetil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To examine the release kinetics of the optimized formulation, the release data obtained from in vitro drug release studies were plotted in various kinetic models: zero-order, first-order, and Higuchi’s model [39]. From the data analysis in Table 4, the Higuchi models achieved the highest correlations ( R 2 = 0.9546) with obtained data, which were plotted as cumulative percentage drug release versus square root of time.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To examine the release kinetics of the optimized formulation, the release data obtained from in vitro drug release studies were plotted in various kinetic models: zero-order, first-order, and Higuchi’s model [39]. From the data analysis in Table 4, the Higuchi models achieved the highest correlations ( R 2 = 0.9546) with obtained data, which were plotted as cumulative percentage drug release versus square root of time.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This initial release from BNPs could be most probably because of the presence of the drug on the surface of NPs or due to the diffusion of the drug from the pores, which are nearer to the surface of NPs [28]. Since NPs have a larger surface-area-to-volume ratio, such geometry is also favored for fast release [29]. To determine the release order, the in vitro release profile of the BNPs was kinetically analyzed.…”
Section: In Vitro Drug-release Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All methods should be properly validated and/or verified before the routine application. [18][19][20][21] The aim of the study…”
Section: Evolution Of Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peaks of standard additions method in concentrations (4.6, 6.85, and 9.1) and peaks height(20,27, and 34 mm), respectively…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%