1996
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(95)00130-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro laxity-testers for knee joints of mice

Abstract: The knee joints of mice can be used as a model for studying the effects of interventions on knee laxity. The goal of this study was to quantify knee joint laxity in vitro. Three devices were developed: a positioning-and cemcnting device, an anterior-posterior (AP) laxity tester and a varus-valgus (VV) laxity tester. The positioningand cementing device was used to position the joint in a reproducible way and to attach clamping pins to the proximal femur and distal tibia using PMMA. The clamping pins were used t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Changes in AP joint laxity of injured knees in this study were similar to values obtained from previous studies using C57BL/6 mice with healthy knees. At ±0.8 N in healthy ACL intact joints, Blankevoort et al measured 0.43 ± 0.16 mm and Wang et al measured 0.50 ± 0.09 mm, compared to 0.57 ± 0.08 mm in our study. The increased joint laxity measured in this study is likely due to the additional degree of freedom in our test fixture, which allowed rotation of the tibia about its longitudinal axis.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Changes in AP joint laxity of injured knees in this study were similar to values obtained from previous studies using C57BL/6 mice with healthy knees. At ±0.8 N in healthy ACL intact joints, Blankevoort et al measured 0.43 ± 0.16 mm and Wang et al measured 0.50 ± 0.09 mm, compared to 0.57 ± 0.08 mm in our study. The increased joint laxity measured in this study is likely due to the additional degree of freedom in our test fixture, which allowed rotation of the tibia about its longitudinal axis.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…This tester was designed to interface with a materials testing machine (Bose ElectroForce 3200). The protocol was similar to that described by Blankevoort et al for anterior–posterior (AP) laxity. Briefly, after fixation in brass tubes with polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), the right and left knees of mice at day 0 ( n = 12), week 12 ( n = 15), and week 16 ( n = 15) after injury were tested at 30°, 60°, and 90° of flexion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of this soft tissue injury on long‐term stability of the joint may prove relevant for ascertaining the healing and mechanical loading of the hip joint in vivo. For well‐established small animal models of knee OA, the quantitative assessment of anterior‐posterior and varus–valgus translation are commonly used as methods for assessing stability and laxity of the knee joint . However, at this time, no such established methods exist for assessing hip joint laxity or for the quantitative measure of hip joint stability for small animal models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 All joints were regularly moistened with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) throughout specimen preparation and testing. Knees were positioned in 608 flexion 18,29 and preconditioned at a constant rate of 0.5 mm/s for five cycles by loading the tibia against a stationary femur to a displacement of AE0.25mm in the anteroposterior direction. Following preconditioning, samples were tested using a tibial displacement of AE0.50 mm for 10 cycles.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%