2015
DOI: 10.15414/jmbfs.2015.4.5.383-386
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Vitro Mass-Screening of Lactic Acid Bacteria as Potential Biosorbents of Cesium and Strontium Ions

Abstract: Many radionuclides were scattered by the explosion at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station. We examined whether lactic acid bacteria (LAB) can sorb cesium ions (Cs+) and strontium ions (Sr2+) for radioprotection. Many strains showed biosorption to Cs+ and Sr2+ using an in vitro mass-screening although each strain showed different sorption. We selected MYU 111, MYU 758, and MYU 759 strains that showed especially high biosorption to Cs+ and/or Sr2+. MYU 111 was identified as Lactobacillus plantarum, and M… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We previously reported that LAB strongly bind heavy metals, e.g. cadmium and mercury [12,13] as well as caesium and strontium [14] from human body. Some LAB strains are known to produce histamine from histidine during the ripening of cheese and wine [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We previously reported that LAB strongly bind heavy metals, e.g. cadmium and mercury [12,13] as well as caesium and strontium [14] from human body. Some LAB strains are known to produce histamine from histidine during the ripening of cheese and wine [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 , Cs is most likely retained in bacteria by trapping in polyphosphate; however, this does not mean that other mechanisms are not involved. Some previously published studies have reported Cs biosorption by the surface components of bacteria 13 , 28 , 34 , 35 , and it is possible that the microorganisms used in this study also adsorbed Cs on the surface. Therefore, the adsorbed Cs + may have been replaced by the highly charged Sr 2+ and released.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Based on our results, it is plausible that Sr is removed by biosorption, which occurs independently of bacterial metabolism, as Sr removal occurred without a nutrient source. In previous reports, the mechanism of Sr removal using microorganisms was considered to be through biosorption occurring on the surface of bacteria 13 , 31 . In addition, our previous study suggested that L. casei JCM1134 removed Sr via adsorption 21 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%