2014
DOI: 10.4081/vl.2014.2107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro measurements of compression bandages and bandage systems: a review of existing methods and recommendations for improvement

Abstract: In this article an overview is presented of identified devices that are or can be used for in vitro pressure and stiffness measurements of compression bandages and bandage systems. The performance of these devices has been evaluated on several parameters as well as the clinical relevance of the findings. In addition, recommendations for improvement and standardization of future measurements from the International Compression Club (ICC) working group compression bandages are presented.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other researchers verified that the PicoPress and AMI air-pack sensors are more accurate than the FlexiForce (piezoresistive sensor) in an examination with a manometer 34 . Further, PicoPress is recommended for in vitro study of compression bandages, and training programs for clinical practitioners are available 7,35 . However, the PicoPress and Kikuhime might be inaccurate when compared with computationally calculated pressures 5,36,37 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other researchers verified that the PicoPress and AMI air-pack sensors are more accurate than the FlexiForce (piezoresistive sensor) in an examination with a manometer 34 . Further, PicoPress is recommended for in vitro study of compression bandages, and training programs for clinical practitioners are available 7,35 . However, the PicoPress and Kikuhime might be inaccurate when compared with computationally calculated pressures 5,36,37 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34 Further, PicoPress is recommended for in vitro study of compression bandages, and training programs for clinical practitioners are available. 7,35 However, the PicoPress and Kikuhime might be inaccurate when compared with computationally calculated pressures. 5,36,37 Electrical pressure-measuring device.…”
Section: Conventional Pressure-measuring Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This quality standard defines the elasticity of bandages by percent elongation following the application of a force of 10 N per cm bandage width. 22 The resulting maximal stretch percentage or extensibility limit categorizes bandages as short stretch and long stretch; in this definition, short stretch has maximum extensibility < 100% and long stretch maximum extensibility > 100% (Figure 11). According to the standard, it is recommended to measure the extensibility by stretching the entire bandage.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Prediction Of Interface Pressurementioning
confidence: 99%