2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2016.07.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro models of medulloblastoma: Choosing the right tool for the job

Abstract: The recently-defined four molecular subgroups of medulloblastoma have required updating of our understanding of in vitro models to include molecular classification and risk stratification features from clinical practice. This review seeks to build a more comprehensive picture of the in vitro systems available for modelling medulloblastoma. The subtype classification and molecular characterisation for over 40 medulloblastoma cell-lines has been compiled, making it possible to identify the strengths and weakness… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
171
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 182 publications
(178 citation statements)
references
References 167 publications
6
171
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to the well-characterized WNT and SHH tumours, the main oncogenic drivers of Group 3 and Group 4 remains to be identified. Although several human cell lines for Group 3 medulloblastoma have been characterized, only few experimental in vivo models have been presented of Group 3 and Group 41516. Group 3 tumours harbour few recurrent mutations, but display structural genomic rearrangements ( e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the well-characterized WNT and SHH tumours, the main oncogenic drivers of Group 3 and Group 4 remains to be identified. Although several human cell lines for Group 3 medulloblastoma have been characterized, only few experimental in vivo models have been presented of Group 3 and Group 41516. Group 3 tumours harbour few recurrent mutations, but display structural genomic rearrangements ( e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S6A; refs. 48,49). MELK interacts with EZH2 in Daoy and MB25550 CSCs, and the xenografts that develop from the two kinds of MBSCs are strongly attenuated by RNA knockdown or inhibitors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, HDAC and MEK1/2 inhibitors cooperate to reduce viability in MB cells and, as with HDACi, MAPK/ERK inhibition hinders neurosphere formation. The cell lines we used have been recently characterized to represent two distinct MB molecular subgroups: D283 cells display MYC amplification and are classified as Group 3/4 MB, whereas Daoy cells are TP53-mutated and represent SHH MB (Ivanov et al, 2016).…”
Section: We Have Previously Shown Responsiveness Of Human Mb Cells Anmentioning
confidence: 99%