2007
DOI: 10.1177/152660280701400517
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Vitro Performance Assessment of Distal Protection Devices for Carotid Artery Stenting: Effect of Physiological Anatomy on Vascular Resistance

Abstract: None of the devices tested completely prevented embolization. Overall, Spider RX had the best performance and is conjectured to have the best wall apposition of the devices tested. Vascular resistance should be considered a key filter design parameter for performance testing since it represents a quantitative estimation of the "slow-flow phenomenon." Our findings should be extrapolated cautiously to help interventionists choose the best device.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
61
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
61
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The EPD EmboshieldNAV showed an amount of 35% of missed particles after injection in a previous test [15]. This value matches with the one found in our study (32%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The EPD EmboshieldNAV showed an amount of 35% of missed particles after injection in a previous test [15]. This value matches with the one found in our study (32%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The result for the round cross profile is in good accordance with previous studies (1%, 4%, 1%) [6,13,15]. The good capture efficiency might be reasoned by the filter geometry [15].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations