2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.01.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro remobilization of Cd immobilized by fungal biomass

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cadmium mobilized by deionized water and 0.1 M NaNO 3 solution with an ionic strength equal to the strength of soil solution is considered to be the most labile. Cadmium extracted with EDTA is strongly bound and difficult to remove by soil solution (Kurek and Majewska, 2004). The increase in Cd concentration in the medium from 1 to 10 μg ml -1 resulted in elevated amounts of Cd extracted from roots with deionized water and 0.1 M NaNO 3 , and decreased amounts of Cd extracted with 0.02 M EDTA (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Cadmium mobilized by deionized water and 0.1 M NaNO 3 solution with an ionic strength equal to the strength of soil solution is considered to be the most labile. Cadmium extracted with EDTA is strongly bound and difficult to remove by soil solution (Kurek and Majewska, 2004). The increase in Cd concentration in the medium from 1 to 10 μg ml -1 resulted in elevated amounts of Cd extracted from roots with deionized water and 0.1 M NaNO 3 , and decreased amounts of Cd extracted with 0.02 M EDTA (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Also, Huang et al (2002) reported that inoculation of rhizobia increased water-soluble Zn and DTPA exchangeable Zn in sediment. However, other researches; Berthelin et al, 1990 andKurek andMajewska (2004) Trichoderma koningii biomass after a 42-day incubation was connected with a transfer of this element from this operational fraction to the most stable residual fraction. However, the role of bacteria in phosphate remediation technology needs to be carefully evaluated;…”
Section: Effect Of Phosphate and Microbial Amendments On U Removalmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Murray et al (1983) have demonstrated the use of synthetic apatite for the retention of uranium and its daughter products from uranium mine leachates. Gauglitz et al (1992) and later Jeanjean (1995) also demonstrated the removal of soluble U by crystalline apatite phase. Bostick et al (2000) demonstrated that ground fish bone (biological apatite) is highly effective for the removal of soluble uranium from synthetic groundwater matrix, and that autunite (calcium uranyl phosphate) crystalline phase is formed at high loadings of uranium.…”
Section: Effect Of Phosphate and Microbial Amendments On U Removalmentioning
confidence: 93%