2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-8805-1_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Vitro Self-Renewal Assays for Brain Tumor Stem Cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected, the addition of the ObR antagonist LDFI significantly decreased these effects ( Figure 4 a–c). In addition, to further confirm the enhanced clonogenic potential and self-renewal properties of glioblastoma cells treated with leptin, we performed the soft agar assay and the limiting dilution assay (LDA), following the methods previously described [ 39 ]. As shown in Figure 4 d, leptin treatment significantly increased colony formation in the anchorage-independent soft agar assay.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As expected, the addition of the ObR antagonist LDFI significantly decreased these effects ( Figure 4 a–c). In addition, to further confirm the enhanced clonogenic potential and self-renewal properties of glioblastoma cells treated with leptin, we performed the soft agar assay and the limiting dilution assay (LDA), following the methods previously described [ 39 ]. As shown in Figure 4 d, leptin treatment significantly increased colony formation in the anchorage-independent soft agar assay.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limiting dilution assay (LDA) was used to evaluate in vitro the frequency of self-renewing cells in our populations, following the protocol described by Seyfrid et al [ 39 ]. Briefly, U-87 MG and T98G cells were grown as neurospheres, as previously described, and after 7 days of growth, neurospheres were dissociate into a single cell suspension and seeded in neurosphere culture media at decreasing densities (100, 50, 10, 1 cell/well) into 96-well ultra-low attachment plates.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The superiority of testing anticancer molecules in three‐dimensional (3D) format like SAA over monolayer culture to validate cell transformation is used since 1977 in clonogenic assay developed by Hamburger and Salmon (1977) and Hamburger (1987). Since then, SAA is widely being used to identify potential antitumor agents and to evaluate the stemness properties of CSCs (Fukazawa, Noguchi, Murakami, & Uehara, 2002; Horibata, Vo, Subramanian, Thompson, & Coonrod, 2015; Seyfrid et al, 2019). More so, the traditional method is also modified with time to overcome time‐consuming, labour intensive process with HTS to meet current oncology drug‐target screening demand (Fukazawa et al, 1995; Ke et al, 2004).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, Horibata, Vo, Subramanian, Thompson, and Coonrod () have used SAA for identifying inhibitors of tumorigenicity in breast cancer cells. In a very recent report, Seyfrid et al () have described SAA as one of the inexpensive and convenient assays for evaluating the stemness properties of brain tumor stem cells.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%