2017
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181324
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro study of accuracy of subaxial cervical pedicle screw insertion using calipers based on the gravity line

Abstract: ObjectThere is a high probability of iatrogenic perforation of the vertebral pedicle wall during the application of subaxial cervical pedicle screw (CPS). The goal of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of CPS insertion at C3-C7 in vitro using novel calipers based on the gravity line.MethodsNine cadaveric cervical spines underwent computed tomography scanning and preoperative design. A lateral fluoroscopic view was taken to measure the intra-operative sagittal angle by C-arm with hanging cross structured K… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, owing to the inherent differences in the spinal structure between the lumbar, cervical, and upper thoracic regions, applying the same criteria for accuracy evaluation in this study was challenging. Consequently, we adapted the Neo classification system for cervical pedicle screws to assess the accuracy of pedicle screw placement 16 , 19 . The evaluation involved categorizing the clinical grades into two groups: acceptable, defined as a grade of ≤ 1 for the Neo classification, and poor, indicated by a grade > 2 (Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, owing to the inherent differences in the spinal structure between the lumbar, cervical, and upper thoracic regions, applying the same criteria for accuracy evaluation in this study was challenging. Consequently, we adapted the Neo classification system for cervical pedicle screws to assess the accuracy of pedicle screw placement 16 , 19 . The evaluation involved categorizing the clinical grades into two groups: acceptable, defined as a grade of ≤ 1 for the Neo classification, and poor, indicated by a grade > 2 (Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the GRS, Neo, and Heary grades were used for postoperative accuracy analysis 19 , 21 . However, technical issues concerning file compatibility, trajectory file processing, and image analysis impede postoperative accuracy analyses in some instances.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the GRS, Neo, and Heary grades were used for postoperative accuracy analysis [19,20]. However, technical issues concerning le compatibility, trajectory le processing, and image analysis impede postoperative accuracy analyses in some instances.…”
Section: Accuracy Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, owing to the inherent differences in the spinal structure between the lumbar, cervical, and upper thoracic regions, applying the same criteria for accuracy evaluation in this study was challenging. Consequently, we adapted the Neo classi cation system for cervical pedicle screws to assess the accuracy of pedicle screw placement [16,19]. The evaluation involved categorizing the clinical grades into two groups: acceptable, de ned as a grade of ≤ 1 for the Neo classi cation, and poor, indicated by a grade > 2 (Supplementary Figure S1).…”
Section: Accuracy Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In early stages, due to the lack of distinctive instruments for ATPS fixation, the AXIS plates and AO reconstruction plates were mostly used as the substitutes [9,20,21]. In the clinic, Zhao et al [21] found that postoperative dysphagia in a few patients might be related to the apparent protrusion of plates and screws on the bone surface.…”
Section: Distinctive Instruments For Atps Fixationmentioning
confidence: 99%