The in vitro interaction between triclosan and fluconazole against 24 azole-resistant clinical isolates of Candida albicans was evaluated by the microdilution checkerboard technique. The synergisms were verified by time-killing curves and agar diffusion tests in selected strains. Antagonistic activity was not detected.Candida albicans is the primary cause of opportunistic fungal disease in humans. It is predominantly found at low levels among the normal oral flora but can thrive in immunocompromised individuals (16,25). Fluconazole has been used successfully as a prophylactic and a first-line therapeutic antifungal agent (5,6,19). However, the increase in azole use has precipitated a rise in drug resistance in clinical isolates. Triclosan, a chlorinated aromatic compound, has antimicrobial (4,8,20), antiparasitic (26), and anti-inflammatory (1, 24) activities. It has been used in personal care products (2). Combination therapy can improve the efficacy of antimicrobial therapy for infections recalcitrant to most treatments. Therefore, we aimed to assess the presence of combination effects with triclosan and fluconazole in C. albicans.A total of 24 clinical isolates of fluconazole-resistant C. albicans were used in this study, and C. albicans ATCC 10231, C. parapsilosis ATCC 90018, and C. krusei ATCC 6258 were used as quality controls. The drugs were purchased from Sigma (Sigma-Aldrich).The drug MICs were determined by broth microdilution according to CLSI method M27-A (3) with an inoculum of 2.5 ϫ 10 3 CFU/ml. The plates were incubated at 35°C, and the optical density (OD) value was determined at 492 nm after 48 h, a modification to the CLSI reference method. All experiments were conducted in triplicate, and the median MIC-1 endpoint value, which represents an 80% reduction in turbidity, and MIC-2 endpoint value, which represents a 50% reduction in turbidity, were calculated (3). The drug interactions were analyzed using the fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) and ⌬E models based on the Loewe additivity and Bliss independence theories, respectively (14, 21). The FICIs were defined as the sum of the MICs of each drug used in the combination divided by the MIC of the drug used alone. Synergy and antagonism were defined by FICIs of Յ0.5 and Ͼ4, respectively (15). The ⌬E model was calculated as the sums of the percentages of all statistically significant (SS) synergistic (ΑSYN) and antagonistic (ΑANT) interactions. Interactions that were Ͻ100% and Ͼ200% SS interactions were considered weak and strong, respectively. Interactions that were 100 to 200% SS interactions were considered moderate (14). The numbers of SS synergistic and antagonistic combinations were calculated for each strain.A 100-l sample of 10 6 CFU/ml C. albicans YL345, which exhibited the best synergistic effect, was spread onto a yeast extract-peptone-dextrose agar surface. Subsequently, 6-mmdiameter paper disks, impregnated with drugs or dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) alone, were placed onto the surface. The inhibition zones were measured usi...