2019
DOI: 10.17305/bjbms.2019.4378
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro toxicity model: Upgrades to bridge the gap between preclinical and clinical research

Abstract: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) provides extensive data that indicate our need for drugs to maintain human population health. Despite the substantial availability of drugs on the market, many patients lack specific drugs. New drugs are required to tackle this issue. Moreover, we need more reliable models for testing drug toxicity, as too many drug approval failures occur with the current models. This article briefly describes various approaches of the currently used models for toxicity scr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(66 reference statements)
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such contradictory results of in vitro and in vivo toxicity assessments are not unique to this study as it is known that while all of the processes in the human organism are interconnected, in vitro toxicity models mainly focus on biomolecules involved in particular cellular pathways, and such a singular focus on only a specific cell impairment may not be accurate because it neglects the self-repair ability of cells, including the repair mechanisms at the DNA level. 48 Accordingly, as various factors, such as homeostatic imbalance, cell density, cell shape, toxicokinetics, cell viability evaluation methods, end-point, nutrient intake, etc., are major limitations of in vitro cell-based toxicity models, 49 the in vivo acute toxicity assay results (Figure 3B) are a more wholesome and accurate representation of the toxicity of the designed peptides.…”
Section: ■ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such contradictory results of in vitro and in vivo toxicity assessments are not unique to this study as it is known that while all of the processes in the human organism are interconnected, in vitro toxicity models mainly focus on biomolecules involved in particular cellular pathways, and such a singular focus on only a specific cell impairment may not be accurate because it neglects the self-repair ability of cells, including the repair mechanisms at the DNA level. 48 Accordingly, as various factors, such as homeostatic imbalance, cell density, cell shape, toxicokinetics, cell viability evaluation methods, end-point, nutrient intake, etc., are major limitations of in vitro cell-based toxicity models, 49 the in vivo acute toxicity assay results (Figure 3B) are a more wholesome and accurate representation of the toxicity of the designed peptides.…”
Section: ■ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study showed the different sensitivity of the cells, depending on the species origin. It is vital to choose a proper in vitro model for drug toxicity studies [ 30 ]. The sensitivity of cells may depend on their type and tissue origin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The root of the problem is at the cellular level when chemotherapeutic drugs fail to differentiate between normal cells and tumor cells and indiscriminately target the normal cells causing undesired cytotoxicity. Therefore, a representative in vitro toxicity model is needed to understand the difference between target and non-target cells and then predict the possible toxicity 56 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%