2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2005.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivo anatomy of the Neer and Hawkins sign positions for shoulder impingement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
43
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Pappas et al determined the in vivo relationship of the insertion of the supraspinatus tendon with magnetic resonance imaging using both tests, demonstrating that the HawkinsKennedy test caused both an increased incidence of, and a greater decrease in, the distance of the supraspinatus to the acromion than Neer's sign 10 . A recent pooled data analysis from Hegedus et al has shown the sensitivity (a true positive) of each of the tests varies (79% for Hawkins-Kennedy; 72% for Neer's test) but, importantly, specificity (the statistical ability of a test to be negative when a defined pathological condition is not present) is lower, calculated at 59% and 60%, respectively 11 .…”
Section: Hawkins-kennedy Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pappas et al determined the in vivo relationship of the insertion of the supraspinatus tendon with magnetic resonance imaging using both tests, demonstrating that the HawkinsKennedy test caused both an increased incidence of, and a greater decrease in, the distance of the supraspinatus to the acromion than Neer's sign 10 . A recent pooled data analysis from Hegedus et al has shown the sensitivity (a true positive) of each of the tests varies (79% for Hawkins-Kennedy; 72% for Neer's test) but, importantly, specificity (the statistical ability of a test to be negative when a defined pathological condition is not present) is lower, calculated at 59% and 60%, respectively 11 .…”
Section: Hawkins-kennedy Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These previous studies have measured the subacromial space under in-vivo conditions with various imaging modalities, including three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (Lochmuller et al, 1997), clinical radiographs (van de Sande and Rozing, 2006,van de Sande et al, 2006,Lehtinen et al, 2000,Petersson and Redlund-Johnell, 1984, ultrasound imaging (Girometti et al, 2006,Azzoni et al, 2004, and MRI (Pappas et al, 2006,Graichen et al, 1998,Graichen et al, 1999b,Graichen et al, 1999a,Graichen et al, 2001,Graichen et al, 2005,Hinterwimmer et al, 2003,Roberts et al, 2002,Solem-Bertoft et al, 1993. Additional studies have estimated the subacromial space width based on shoulder kinematics as measured using skin-mounted sensors (Tsai et al, 2003,Thigpen et al, 2006,Ludewig and Cook, 2002,Nawoczenski et al, 2003.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[17] Yapılan çalışma-larda rotator manşetin akromiyona omuz 90º'de iken daha yakın olduğu gözlenmiş, yani Hawkins testinin Neer işaretine göre daha fazla subakromiyal daralmaya yol açtığı belirtilmiştir. [18,19] Bunların yanı sıra, Neer'in sıkışma testi invaziv bir yöntem olup 10 ml'lik lokal anestetik ajanın subakromiyal bölgeye enjekte edildikten sonra provokatif manevralar sonucu var olan ağrının yok olması ile seyreder (Şekil 5. a-c). [2] Bu testin pozitifliği, subakromiyal dekompresyonun sonucunun büyük oranda başarılı olabileceği gösterir.…”
Section: Klinik Ve Anamnezunclassified