2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10792-019-01154-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivo and in vitro results of an automated preloaded delivery system for IOL implantation in cataract surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The roughness average (Ra), that is the arithmetic mean of the absolute values of the height of the surface profile, was assumed for the statistical analysis. Five samples of each group were analyzed, and the mean values (±standard deviation) were considered for statistical analysis (Mastropasqua et al, 2020).…”
Section: Atomic Force Microscopy (Afm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The roughness average (Ra), that is the arithmetic mean of the absolute values of the height of the surface profile, was assumed for the statistical analysis. Five samples of each group were analyzed, and the mean values (±standard deviation) were considered for statistical analysis (Mastropasqua et al, 2020).…”
Section: Atomic Force Microscopy (Afm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ey also postulated that the difference between the motorized injector and the manual injector is due to a combination of factors, such as the different pressure required to maintain close apposition of the cartridge tip to the wound, discontinuous movement of the IOL through the wound with the manual injector, rotation of the tip around the zaxis of the injector when turning the screw, and yaw (sideto-side movement) in relation to the wound entrance when manipulating the manual injector [6]. Mastropasqua et al [9] demonstrated that the AutonoMe, CO 2 -powerd automated injector, caused less tissue damage to the cornea compared with the Monarch III injector, and this result is probably attributable to a greater amount of corneal stress and trauma at the wound provided by the conventional injector system compared to the automated delivery system. It was postulated that automated delivery system prevents surgeons' inadvertent maneuvers during IOL implantation as it could occur when using manual injectors, and can standardize the injection procedures [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mastropasqua et al [9] demonstrated that the AutonoMe, CO 2 -powerd automated injector, caused less tissue damage to the cornea compared with the Monarch III injector, and this result is probably attributable to a greater amount of corneal stress and trauma at the wound provided by the conventional injector system compared to the automated delivery system. It was postulated that automated delivery system prevents surgeons' inadvertent maneuvers during IOL implantation as it could occur when using manual injectors, and can standardize the injection procedures [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several experimental and clinical studies have reported that the new lens had the lowest levels of surface and bulk inhomogeneities and optical characteristics including surface light scattering, glistenings, and chromatic aberration compared to the commercially available IOLs, those resulted in good clinical outcomes [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. Several previous reports have evaluated the clinical results of the Clareon IOL with the AutonoMe 1 automated delivery system [2,11]; however, no reports have described the early postoperative refractive stability or the postoperative wound-repair process. The current study reports the refractive stability in the early postoperative period and the wound repair process after cataract surgery with the Clareon IOL and the AutonoMe automated delivery system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%