2017
DOI: 10.22159/ijpps.2017v9i6.17200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Vivo Anti-Diabetic Activity Evaluation of the Bark of Cascabela Thevetia L. In Streptozotocin Induced Diabetic Rats

Abstract: Objective: In this study, the plant Cascabela thevetia L. was selected based on ethnomedicinal documentation reports for evaluation of the antidiabetic activity. The aim of this study was to carry out acute toxicity study and in vivo evaluation of antidiabetic activity in an animal model. Methods:Firstly direct extraction of the dried bark powder was done with methanol using soxhlet apparatus. After collecting the extract, acute toxicity study was performed according to OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The active binding site coordinates took for the docking study were X: 199.351540,Y: 219.641972, Z: 178.491488 and radius:11.225346 Å for 5YW7; and X: 203.022540,Y: 281.546343, Z: 218.193527and radius:11.899795 Å for 6PZA ( Figure S1 ). Then the docking was performed using the simulation‐based docking protocol ‘CDocker’ of DS 2018 [33] . Before docking of the test compound MEA, redocking of the co‐crystal ligand (glibenclamide) was done to validate the study and the docking poses of the glibenclamide were compared with the original co‐crystal pose to calculate the RMSD values ( Figure S2 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The active binding site coordinates took for the docking study were X: 199.351540,Y: 219.641972, Z: 178.491488 and radius:11.225346 Å for 5YW7; and X: 203.022540,Y: 281.546343, Z: 218.193527and radius:11.899795 Å for 6PZA ( Figure S1 ). Then the docking was performed using the simulation‐based docking protocol ‘CDocker’ of DS 2018 [33] . Before docking of the test compound MEA, redocking of the co‐crystal ligand (glibenclamide) was done to validate the study and the docking poses of the glibenclamide were compared with the original co‐crystal pose to calculate the RMSD values ( Figure S2 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…><0.01 by using one-way analysis of variance followed by Dunnet comparison all vs. control method. Further isolation of the compounds can lead to finding out the exact compound responsible for the activity, but furthermore, studies like molecular level and clinical level studies are required to establish its importance as a potent medicinal plant 35 .…”
Section: Antidiarrhoeal Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blood samples were collected from the tail vein of the overnight fasted rats and blood glucose level was determined on 0 th , 5 th , 10 th and 15 th day along with body weight. On the 15 th day, all the animals were humanely sacrificed using CPCSEA recommended euthanasia procedure (Carbon dioxide inhalation method) and evaluated for the biochemical parameters along with histopathology of the pancreas tissue 7 . Alkaloid-the secondary metabolite present in plants has been investigated for antidiabetic activity.…”
Section: Induction Of Experimental Diabetesmentioning
confidence: 99%