1995
DOI: 10.1128/aac.39.1.56
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivo antiherpesvirus activity of N-7-substituted acyclic nucleoside analog 2-amino-7-[(1,3-dihydroxy-2-propoxy)methyl]purine

Abstract: The efficacy of 2-amino-7-[(1,3-dihydroxy-2-propoxy)methyl]purine (S2242) was evaluated in several animal models for herpesvirus infections. Compound S2242 was more effective than acyclovir (i) when administered subcutaneously in a model for herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1)-induced mortality in immunocompetent mice and (ii) when applied topically to hairless (hr/hr) mice that had been infected intracutaneously with HSV-2. In SCID (severe combined immune deficient) mice that had been infected with a thymidin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cidofovir and S-2242 have similar in vitro activities against MAV-1, and the in vitro sensitivity of MAV-1 to cidofovir and S-2242 is comparable to those of several herpesviruses. Although the doses in our in vivo studies are comparable to those used in animal studies with herpesviruses, it seems that cidofovir and S-2242 are less effective in inhibiting mortality in the MAV-1/SCID model than in the herpesvirus models (40)(41)(42). It is rather unlikely that the limited effectiveness of cidofovir and S-2242 in our MAV-1 model is due to poor disposition, since both antiviral drugs are supposed to have different pharmacokinetics and organ distribution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Cidofovir and S-2242 have similar in vitro activities against MAV-1, and the in vitro sensitivity of MAV-1 to cidofovir and S-2242 is comparable to those of several herpesviruses. Although the doses in our in vivo studies are comparable to those used in animal studies with herpesviruses, it seems that cidofovir and S-2242 are less effective in inhibiting mortality in the MAV-1/SCID model than in the herpesvirus models (40)(41)(42). It is rather unlikely that the limited effectiveness of cidofovir and S-2242 in our MAV-1 model is due to poor disposition, since both antiviral drugs are supposed to have different pharmacokinetics and organ distribution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…This compound is a potent and selective inhibitor of virtually all herpesviruses (83) and inhibits VV replication at an IC 50 of 0.4 g/ml (Table 1). In vivo, S2242 was more effective than acyclovir against HSV infection and far more effective than ganciclovir against cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection (84). Recently, this agent was shown to be fully protective against VV infection when given as its diacetate ester prodrug (H961) in both immunocompetent and SCID (severe combined immunodeficient) mice (86) (see Table 2).…”
Section: Nucleoside Analogues (Presumably) Targeted At Viral Dna Syntmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the acyclic nucleoside phosphonate analogs this long-lasting antiviral activity has also been observed in several animal models for virus infections as well as in the clinical setting (14,15,20,(25)(26)(27). However, although S2242 has a more pronounced in vivo activity than DHPG and ACV against several herpesvirus infections, it does not seem to cause as prolonged an antiviral response in vivo as the acyclic nucleoside phosphonate analogs (17).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%