2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00345-017-2124-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivo assessment of a novel biodegradable ureteral stent

Abstract: Notwithstanding the limitations of the present study, the in vivo testing of our novel natural origin polymer-based BUS suggests this device to feature homogeneous degradation, good urine drainage, and high biocompatibility. Next steps will be to increase its stability, and to improve the radiopacity without compromising its degradation. Ultimately, clinical studies will be required to determine the safety and feasibility of its use in humans.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
35
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this review, the term device‐associated UTI designates both these types of devices. The following clinical needs have been identified: a) better methods for diagnosing and quantifying microbial colonization, b) development of antimicrobial agents that can disrupt and/or prevent formation of biofilms including crystalline biofilms, c) development of surface coatings that resist and/or reduce microbial adhesion and colonization, as well as d) reducing the use of conventional antimicrobial agents in order to reduce development of resistance …”
Section: Device‐associated Urinary Tract Infectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this review, the term device‐associated UTI designates both these types of devices. The following clinical needs have been identified: a) better methods for diagnosing and quantifying microbial colonization, b) development of antimicrobial agents that can disrupt and/or prevent formation of biofilms including crystalline biofilms, c) development of surface coatings that resist and/or reduce microbial adhesion and colonization, as well as d) reducing the use of conventional antimicrobial agents in order to reduce development of resistance …”
Section: Device‐associated Urinary Tract Infectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52] Novel biodegradable ureteral stents were manufactured using Uriprene to improve urine drainage, provide good biocompatibility and avoid traditional removal. 37 The issues with these stents included axial rigidity leading to difficult placement, non-uniform degradation and the biodegrading time of 10 weeks which was longer than typical indwelling stents. The potential disadvantages are the complete degradation over a few days which limits the use for very short-term stenting.…”
Section: Variations In Stent Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, studies by Barros et al and Soria et al have demonstrated degradation in a predictable and controlled fashion with no obstructive fragments. 37,39 Certain stents have strings attached to help removal and some have baskets to improve the passageway for small stones and stop bigger stones' migration through the ureter. 4,38 There are other stents made from biodegradable/bioabsorbable metal mesh and some have polymeric flap valves to reduce reflux.…”
Section: Variations In Stent Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The in vivo degraded experiment indicated that this stent exhibited the fastest biodegradation rate than the control group. Moreover, the stent could effectively reduce the bacterial adhesion and showed excellent biocompatibility properties (Barros et al, 2018).…”
Section: Natural Origin Polymersmentioning
confidence: 99%