2016
DOI: 10.1149/07201.0091ecst
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-Vivo Characterization of Glassy Carbon µ-Electrodes and Histological Analysis of Brain Tissue after Chronic Implants

Abstract: For neural applications, materials that combine excellent electromechanical properties with long-term performance capabilities are ideal. Good electrodes should be able to not only adapt to eventual physiological changes in the body, but also perform without damaging the host tissue. The combination of these characteristics is difficult to accomplish, since the ability of a material to undergo changes is often accompanied by the formation of reaction products that might interact with the surrounding tissue. Gl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Depending on the type of damage and on the targeted anatomical area, design and location of the implants changes (Figure 1) and can be tailored for reaching the best compromise between invasiveness and function restoration. Although they are considered minimally invasive when compared to penetrating devices, microelectrode arrays (MEAs) for ECoG still elicit foreign-body response and glial scar formation that can—in the long term—isolate them from the nerve cells [3,4,5]. One way to minimize their encapsulation is to reduce the substrate footprint on the brain surface and promote the diffusion of soluble factors through the devices by optimizing their design [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the type of damage and on the targeted anatomical area, design and location of the implants changes (Figure 1) and can be tailored for reaching the best compromise between invasiveness and function restoration. Although they are considered minimally invasive when compared to penetrating devices, microelectrode arrays (MEAs) for ECoG still elicit foreign-body response and glial scar formation that can—in the long term—isolate them from the nerve cells [3,4,5]. One way to minimize their encapsulation is to reduce the substrate footprint on the brain surface and promote the diffusion of soluble factors through the devices by optimizing their design [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various sp 2 ‐rich carbon materials are cytocompatible, corrosion resistant, electrically conductive, and electrochemically stable . Carbon‐based ECoG electrodes have been successfully tested as multimodal electrode material utilizing graphene flakes, carbon nanotubes (CNTs), glassy carbon, and carbon fibers (CFs) . Recently there has been a lot of progress in the field of graphene‐based transparent flexible devices .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%