“…Over the past decade, therapeutic peptides, 12,13 stem cells [e.g., embryonic stem cells, 14 induced pluripotential stem cells, fetal stem cells, adult stem cells 15 ], stem-cell-derived somatic cells [e.g., cardiomyocytes, 15 smooth muscle cells, 16,17 endothelial cells 15 ], stem cell transplantation in combination with biomaterials, 16,18−20 miRNAs, 21 gene therapy, 22 xenotransplantation of hearts, 23 and extracellular vesicles (EVs) 24 have been tested in preclinical studies and clinical trials. However, these treatments have yet to advance the standard of care for acute MI and subsequent HF due to multiple reasons, including limited options for treatment administration, the instability of novel therapeutics [such as peptides 25 and miRNAs in vivo 21 ], and uncertainties about the clinical efficacy of cellular therapies, such as stem cell engraftment. 17 Compared to stem cell and gene therapy, peptide-based treatments have shown promise for treating diseases, such as cardiovascular disorders, probably owing to their high affinity and specificity for their targets, as well as their relative safety and low number of side effects.…”