2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2004.01.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivo elbow biomechanical analysis during flexion: three-dimensional motion analysis using magnetic resonance imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
56
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
56
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This system has been used previously to study kinematics of the cervical spine, elbow, and wrist. [6][7][8][9] In the present study, we obtained MR images of the shoulder girdle in a seated position during arm abduction using a vertically open MRI. The purpose was to analyze the translation and rotational motion in the AC joint.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This system has been used previously to study kinematics of the cervical spine, elbow, and wrist. [6][7][8][9] In the present study, we obtained MR images of the shoulder girdle in a seated position during arm abduction using a vertically open MRI. The purpose was to analyze the translation and rotational motion in the AC joint.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 It has a bony geometry, articulation, and soft tissue structures, and the amount of force transmitted across the joint depends on the loading configurations and the angular orientation of the joint. 21 Our particular interest was focused on the angle between the arm and the forearm in the frontal plane, 1,2,3,7,12,20,17,23,24,27,36,31 called the carrying angle, which has an important role when carrying loads. 31 This angle is most apparent and best seen when the shoulder is externally rotated, the elbow is completely extended, and the forearm is supinated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent in vivo studies have shown that there is considerable variation in the position and orientation of the normal elbow flexion axis in vivo. 4,6 Theoretically, the design of the different implants should allow a certain degree of freedom in this axis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%