2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.02.071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivo evaluation of tetrahedral amorphous carbon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On microscopy of stained sections, a mild inflammatory response was observed at both time points in the tissues directly adjacent to the device. Tissue reaction was consistent with what was reported for other implanted devices (11,35).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…On microscopy of stained sections, a mild inflammatory response was observed at both time points in the tissues directly adjacent to the device. Tissue reaction was consistent with what was reported for other implanted devices (11,35).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…It would appear, however, that the hypothesis that superior elasticity leads to reduced toxicity [12,42] is incorrect in this case. We note that extremely inflexible materials, such as wafers of tetrahedral amorphous carbon and silicon, can show essentially no local toxicity after implantation [43]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ta-C specimens were fabricated at Sandia National Laboratories using pulsed laser deposition (PLD) at room temperature [3]. The films were grown on top of a Si (100) substrate with a 2 µm thick SiO 2 sacrificial layer followed by a 0.1 µm polysilicon adhesion layer.…”
Section: A Specimen Fabricationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to polysilicon ta-C has superior mechanical properties, such as hardness, wear resistance, stiffness (Young's modulus) and Poison's ratio [2]. The mechanical reliability and durability of ta-C is of critical importance for applications in electronic and biological devices [3,4]. However, mechanical reliability can be ensured with the thorough study of its failure strength and fracture toughness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%