2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.09.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivo experimental testing and model identification of human scalp skin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although a full description of the mechanical behaviour of the skin requires a more complex modelling (Lanir and Fung 1974) the adopted simplifications make the developed growth modelling a feasible task, as discussed in the following. On the other hand, other finite element models recently developed to simulate the mechanical behaviour of the skin during wound closure or surgical procedures adopted similar assumptions (Kirby et al 1998;Bischoff et al 2000;Gambarotta et al 2005) in order to simplify the numerical simulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a full description of the mechanical behaviour of the skin requires a more complex modelling (Lanir and Fung 1974) the adopted simplifications make the developed growth modelling a feasible task, as discussed in the following. On the other hand, other finite element models recently developed to simulate the mechanical behaviour of the skin during wound closure or surgical procedures adopted similar assumptions (Kirby et al 1998;Bischoff et al 2000;Gambarotta et al 2005) in order to simplify the numerical simulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since it is impossible to capture the full mechanical response of human skin in one single experiment, different types of experiments have been performed to partially capture this response. Most studies involved experiments on in vivo human skin, comprising uniaxial tensile (Mahmud et al, 2012;Delalleau et al, 2008b;Gambarotta et al, 2005), multiaxial tensile (Flynn et al, 2011(Flynn et al, , 2011(Flynn et al, , 2013Khatyr et al, 2004;Kvistedal and Nielsen, 2009), suction (Khatyr et al, 2006;Delalleau et al, 2008aDelalleau et al, , 2011Delalleau et al, , 2012Hendriks et al, 2003) and indentation (Groves et al, 2012;Delalleau et al, 2006;Kumar et al, 2015) experiments. Although it is preferable to measure skin in its natural environment, in vivo measurements have limitations for several reasons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other constitutive models described the mechanical behavior as linear elastic (Delalleau et al, 2006), nonlinear (hyper)elastic using Ogden (Groves et al, 2012(Groves et al, , 2013Jor et al, 2011;Li and Xiaoyu, 2016;Evans, 2009;Flynn et al, 2011Flynn et al, , 2011Karimi et al, 2015;Mahmud et al, 2012;Lapeer et al, 2010;Limbert, 2011), Mooney-Rivlin (Flynn et al, 2013;Hendriks et al, 2003), (extended) Neo-Hookean (Delalleau et al, 2008a(Delalleau et al, , 2011(Delalleau et al, , 2012, Kalman filters (Delalleau et al, 2008b), Tong-Fung (Kvistedal and Nielsen, 2009;Gambarotta et al, 2005) or viscoelastic (Lokshin and Lanir, 2009a;Khatyr et al, 2004;Holt et al, 2008;Bischoff, 2006;Karimi et al, 2016;Kumar et al, 2015). The necessity to capture a certain level of mechanical complexity with a constitutive model is dependent on the application.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pérez del Palomar et al [1] fitted the constant of a neo-Hookean model for the tissue inside the breast with this technique. This tissue was then covered with a layer of skin, modelled with a polynomial strain energy function and with constants taken from the experimental results obtained by Gambarotta et al [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%