1999
DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.1999.00587.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Vivo Gene Therapy with Interleukin-12 Inhibits Primary Vascular Tumor Growth and Induces Apoptosis in a Mouse Model1

Abstract: Interleukin-12 is proposed to have anti-neoplastic activity on the basis of both its anti-angiogenic and immunologic effects. Gene gun therapy with interleukin-12 cDNA into the peritumoral area of immunocompetent 129/J mice with life-threatening primary vascular tumors reduced tumor volume 7.5-fold and almost tripled the duration of mouse survival, in contrast with luciferase-bombarded control mice. Epidermal expression of mouse interleukin-12 elevated tumoral and serum levels of interferon-gamma and tumor nec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
25
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…All mice received a total injection volume of 150 l. Differences were statistically significant when comparing the incidence of HE in mice receiving EOMA cells alone vs. anti-MCP-1 treatment or IgG vs. anti-MCP-1 treatments for both 129P3 and C57Bl/6 strains. Among MCP-1 Ϫ/Ϫ mice treated, statistically significant differences were not observed with EOMA or EOMA ϩ aMCP-1, but there was a statistically significant difference between EOMA ϩ aMCP-1 and EOMA ϩ aMCP-1 ϩ M. *P Ͻ 0.05. batimastat, IL-12, and angiostatin (1,19,31,39,43), none of these agents focus on the contributions of macrophages. By removing MCP-1 from the local tumor environment at the time of EOMA cell inoculation, the significance of macrophages in allowing HE to develop was highlighted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All mice received a total injection volume of 150 l. Differences were statistically significant when comparing the incidence of HE in mice receiving EOMA cells alone vs. anti-MCP-1 treatment or IgG vs. anti-MCP-1 treatments for both 129P3 and C57Bl/6 strains. Among MCP-1 Ϫ/Ϫ mice treated, statistically significant differences were not observed with EOMA or EOMA ϩ aMCP-1, but there was a statistically significant difference between EOMA ϩ aMCP-1 and EOMA ϩ aMCP-1 ϩ M. *P Ͻ 0.05. batimastat, IL-12, and angiostatin (1,19,31,39,43), none of these agents focus on the contributions of macrophages. By removing MCP-1 from the local tumor environment at the time of EOMA cell inoculation, the significance of macrophages in allowing HE to develop was highlighted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…JNK was selected as a potential target because one of the flavonoid components present in blueberry extract, epigallocatechin 3-gallate (ECGC), can activate transcription of the tumor suppressor gene p21 WAF1/CIP1 independent of p53, which forms a tight complex with JNK-1 to inactivate it (42,55). The outcome of JNK-1 activity is phosphorylation/activation of c-Jun and constituent activation of c-Jun in endothelial cells has been shown to result in MCP-1 expression (62). The in vitro effects of BBE and JNK inhibition observed in the EOMA model are consistent with other published reports.…”
Section: Discusssionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The endothelial cell phenotype of EOMA cells has been confirmed (38,50), and other investigators have used it to test antiangiogenic compounds for tumor therapy (1,28,37,60,62). When EOMA cells are injected subcutaneously into mice, they form hemangioendotheliomas (HE) with 100% efficiency.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…15 -17 One of the most potent anticancer cytokines, IL -12, has been shown to suppress progression of experimental hemangiomas. 18,19 IP -10 (interferon -inducible protein with molecular weight of 10 kDa, recently classified as CXCL10 ) has been identified as a major IL -12-induced downstream effector of antitumor reactions, and found to inhibit the growth of several experimental tumors with varying efficacy, depending on the model and method of delivery. 20 -26 Although the mechanism of IP -10 -induced tumor suppression has not yet been fully elucidated, both antiangiogenic and immune system -mediated effects appear to be essential to the antitumor activity of this chemokine in vivo.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%