2022
DOI: 10.3390/genes13122222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Vivo Hematopoietic Stem Cell Genome Editing: Perspectives and Limitations

Abstract: The tremendous evolution of genome-editing tools in the last two decades has provided innovative and effective approaches for gene therapy of congenital and acquired diseases. Zinc-finger nucleases (ZFNs), transcription activator- like effector nucleases (TALENs) and CRISPR-Cas9 have been already applied by ex vivo hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) gene therapy in genetic diseases (i.e., Hemoglobinopathies, Fanconi anemia and hereditary Immunodeficiencies) as well as infectious diseases (i.e., HIV), and the recent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 227 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CRISPR epigenome editors consist of a catalytically inactivated “dead” Cas9 (dCas9) tethered to the catalytic domain of epigenetic effectors such as DNMTs or ten-eleven translocation (TET) methyl-cytosine dioxygenases, HATs, or HDACs to potentiate or repress gene expression. A gRNA complementary to the target DNA sequence navigates the CRISPR-dCas9 epi-editor to the target site, whether that is a promoter or distal cis-regulatory sequence [ 45 ]. Epigenetic editing can be used to promote (CRISPR activation, CRISPRa) or attenuate (CRISPR interference, CRISPRi), the transcriptional activity based on the recruitment of transcriptional activators (VP64) or repressors (Krüppel associated box (KRAB) domain) to specific sites [ 46 , 47 ].…”
Section: Epigenetic Modificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CRISPR epigenome editors consist of a catalytically inactivated “dead” Cas9 (dCas9) tethered to the catalytic domain of epigenetic effectors such as DNMTs or ten-eleven translocation (TET) methyl-cytosine dioxygenases, HATs, or HDACs to potentiate or repress gene expression. A gRNA complementary to the target DNA sequence navigates the CRISPR-dCas9 epi-editor to the target site, whether that is a promoter or distal cis-regulatory sequence [ 45 ]. Epigenetic editing can be used to promote (CRISPR activation, CRISPRa) or attenuate (CRISPR interference, CRISPRi), the transcriptional activity based on the recruitment of transcriptional activators (VP64) or repressors (Krüppel associated box (KRAB) domain) to specific sites [ 46 , 47 ].…”
Section: Epigenetic Modificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gene editing tools can be used to modify the CCR5 gene in hematopoietic stem cells. Initial studies have used Zinc Finger Nucleases and TALENs gene-editing tools, but have presented many limitations, such as low gene editing efficiency, high offtarget rate, and costly vector construction [24]. Despite the presence of other gene-editing techniques, CRISPR has been proven to be the most reliable and effective method [25].…”
Section: Genetic Engineering Of Hematopoietic Stem Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Single-mutation diseases such as SCD, represent ideal targets for gene editing. Moreover, the ability of gene editing to introduce targeted mutations that may cause a disease-modulatory effect made it possible to use a universal approach to target, in addition to SCD, the many different thalassemia mutations through the reactivation of the endogenous γ-globin gene [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. Gene editing utilizes for the targeted introduction of point mutations or small deletions and insertions of the cells' endogenous DNA damage response mechanism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%