2006
DOI: 10.1128/jvi.80.10.4748-4757.2006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Vivo Interactions of Ecotropic and Polytropic Murine Leukemia Viruses in Mixed Retrovirus Infections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(49 reference statements)
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1A). This observation is consistent with our in vivo results indicating highly elevated polytropic MuLV replication in coinoculated mice (22,33). Similar results were observed when M. dunni cells chronically infected with Fr98 were superinfected with F-MuLV.…”
Section: Amplification Of Polytropic Mulvs Released From Cell Lines Csupporting
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…1A). This observation is consistent with our in vivo results indicating highly elevated polytropic MuLV replication in coinoculated mice (22,33). Similar results were observed when M. dunni cells chronically infected with Fr98 were superinfected with F-MuLV.…”
Section: Amplification Of Polytropic Mulvs Released From Cell Lines Csupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In previous studies, we observed that inoculation of mice with mixtures of the ecotropic virus F-MuLV and the polytropic isolate Fr98 or Fr54 resulted in a profound elevation of the polytropic virus load (22,33). To determine if this occurred in vitro, we compared infectious polytropic viruses released from cell lines infected with only the polytropic virus to polytropic viruses released from cells infected with both the polytropic virus and F-MuLV.…”
Section: Amplification Of Polytropic Mulvs Released From Cell Lines Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the number of infectious particles (6.4 × 10 6 ) was much higher than what has been used for infection of cats with feline leukaemia virus (FeLV) and mice with murine leukaemia virus (MuLV). Between 1 × 10 4 TCID50 [29] and 1 × 10 6 ffu [30] FeLV was sufficient to infect cats oronasally, and 2 × 10 4 ffu was used for successful infection of mice with MuLV [31]. The absence of antibodies may be explained either by the absence of replication or by the fact that pigs are immunologically tolerant to PERVs, as they are endogenous.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%