2015
DOI: 10.1080/21681163.2015.1072056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivo intraoperative hypoglossal nerve stimulation for quantitative tongue motion analysis

Abstract: This is the first study quantitatively measuring tongue motion in 3D after in vivo intraoperative neurostimulation of the hypoglossal nerve and its branches during a neck dissection procedure. Firstly, this study is performed to show whether this set-up is suitable for innervating different muscles or muscle groups with an identifiable corresponding motion pattern by stimulating the main stem and the visible branches and by performing an intra-patient comparison over the captured 3D trajectories. Secondly, an … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 3D camera setup has previously been used in our research group and therefore available to assess 3D location on tongue movements [17]. However, a similar setup could also be made of two regular consumer cameras with a lower frame rate, or even just by capturing pictures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 3D camera setup has previously been used in our research group and therefore available to assess 3D location on tongue movements [17]. However, a similar setup could also be made of two regular consumer cameras with a lower frame rate, or even just by capturing pictures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, previous research from our group shows that a specific global branching topology is not limited to characteristic muscle activity. Even within one patient, both sides of the tongue can have different distal branching topologies resulting in different muscle activations on a micro level [ 28 ]. The variety in distal branching patterns might be the reason that there are so many differences between the tongue abilities of people.…”
Section: Literature Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To acquire 3D lip movements, we tracked six optical face markers for head orientation and ten optical lip markers at 100 frames per second using a triple camera set-up (avA1000–100gc, Basler AG, Ahrensburg, Germany), which we had developed for assessing tongue mobility and capturing tongue movement after hypoglossal nerve stimulation 8 , 39 (Fig. 1 ).…”
Section: Data Acquisition and Pre-processingmentioning
confidence: 99%